IN THE ABSENCE OF FREE EXPRESSION AND FORCE OF ARMS A FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC CANNOT LONG STAND
THE GOAL OF A TYRANNICAL AMERICAN GOVERNMENT: DIVIDE AND SILENCE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND DISARM THE CITIZENRY
A VIGOROUS SEDITIOUS PRESS AND ROGUE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ACCELERATE THE NEO-MARXIST PLAYBOOK
“We live in an insane society in which people have agreed that certain behaviors qualify as sane and, so long as you follow those behaviors, you will escape scrutiny.
Wisdom and experience, which are cousins, tell me there are certain beliefs I need to carry humbly and hold loosely, while others are more objectively true. Rain is wet. Open-mindedness to counter-arguments might appear more diplomatic, but you don’t really mean it because, come on, water is wet.
‘The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.’ George Orwell, 1984
But what if they tell you water isn’t? What if they tell you it isn’t and mean it?
Here, then, is our situation, our conundrum, and no, none of this is hypothetical, not one syllable:
What if you know what you see with your own eyes but others insist you don’t see it, including some you once trusted? What if they tell you that you have some condition, some mental problem that causes you to overreact and start to see things that aren’t there (or not see things that are)?” ~From a sermon by Mike Rumley-wells
Are the Harris-Biden Administration and the Pelosi-Schumer-Controlled Congress stark, raving mad? And, is the legacy Press abetting an insane Federal Government?
To look at the policies of this Administration and the bills of Congress, and the effects of these policies and Congressional bills on our Nation and on our people, a rational mind would think so. But with a Government whose intent it is to destroy the United States of America as an independent sovereign Nation and a free Constitutional Republic, and whose actions demonstrate the expansiveness and intensity of effort to accomplish that goal, what recourse does a sane mind have in a Nation whose Government claims a need to destroy the Nation in order to save it?
The Government has waged a war on the minds of Americans, begun in earnest, at the turn of the 21st Century. A short span of societal order returned to the country between 2016 and 2020. That was when the public, having had enough of the destruction of the economy and of our National Security wrought by the Bush and Obama Administrations, voted for a change to set the Country back on course, to allow it to operate in a manner consistent with the U.S. Constitution, not against it.
The Nation voted for Donald Trump, who sought to Make America Great Again. And he commenced to do just that, to strengthen our Nation and to proclaim to the world that the United States still existed and intended to continue to exist as a sovereign, independent Nation, in accordance with the tenets, precepts, and principles of Individualism as the framers of the Constitution intended. The framers’ design is antithetical to that of present-day Neo-Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists. They don’t wish for the Nation to remain a free Constitutional Republic at all. Their belief system is grounded and structured on the tenets, precepts, and principles of Collectivism, as exemplified in Communist China and as is coming to fruition in the Countries of the EU. Collectivism is the antithesis of Individualism. See article in Mises:
“From the viewpoint of Marx and Engels, the individual was a negligible thing in the eyes of the nation. Marx and Engels denied that the individual played a role in historical evolution. According to them, history goes its own way. The material productive forces go their own way, developing independently of the wills of individuals. And historical events come with the inevitability of a law of nature. The material productive forces work like a director in an opera; they must have a substitute available in case of a problem, as the opera director must have a substitute if the singer gets sick. According to this idea, Napoleon and Dante, for instance, were unimportant—if they had not appeared to take their own special place in history, someone else would have appeared on stage to fill their shoes.”
These Anti-American forces seek to transform our Nation into a Collectivist society for its eventual inclusion into a new world order, sans national borders and nation-states. And, for us, in America, that would mean oppression, repression, and poverty, drawing this Nation down to the horrific standards of living existent in most of the world. That would be the price Americans would be required to pay for a Collectivist world governed by the tri-Satanic precepts of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion—an ambitious project of the UN, first instituted in the EU, and planned for in the U.S. And now that the puppet-masters of a new world order had succeeded in machinating an election outcome that would place a corrupt, senile charlatan in the Oval Office, and had consolidated their power in Congress, they could return to their original game plan, moving rapidly ahead to make up for lost time, having failed, originally, to place their stooge, Hillary Clinton, in Office in 2017.
Two Branches of this Government, along with the Legacy Press, have successfully conditioned a small section of America to adopt a new way of thinking, to inculcate a new social, political, and economic dogma—a dogma that even comes with its own religion: The Cult of the State—the State (the Government) as God.
To accept this new dogma, the American citizen must forsake everything he or she had previously learned and inculcated. One must accept the new dogma fully, and completely—in body, mind, and soul. This new dogma requires one to disavow past core ethical values. The American citizen must disavow his or her heritage, and history, and pride in one’s Country, and in the National ethos—forsake all those tenets, precepts, and principles grounded on the sanctity, autonomy, and inviolability of the individual, and on the indomitability of the human spirit.
The Cult of the State requires one to disavow the importance of family. One must disavow belief and faith in the Divine, omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, benevolent, and morally perfect Creator, the one perfect God, upon which a great Nation was founded, upon which the Nation and its people have prospered; upon which the import of human life and dignity have been exalted; and upon which the promise of the soul’s immortality, and of life, peace, salvation, and happiness, everlasting in God, alone rest.
But all of that must go. The Cult of the State demands it. And Truth and Sanity, too, must go by the board. So, then, what does one do; what can one do? Succumb willingly to psychosis? Some Americans have. Most have not. But many are buckling under, hoping the “Thought Police” won’t see them, won’t harass them. But, what then? Is capitulation to the Cult of the State the answer? Accept our fate?
But, then, is this TO BE our fate—is it to be the destiny of our people, of our Country, a free Constitutional Republic? Must Americans now face the fact, accept the fact as propagated by the media, that a once-powerful, and happy, and healthy, and successful Nation that once existed, should exist no more? And is this not predicated on the notion that Americans should sacrifice what is in their best interests and in the best interests of the Nation to the Greater Collective good of the whole? And, what does the expression ‘Collective Good of the whole’ mean that Americans should surrender their interests to it? Is that notion not based on utilitarianism?
But, then, who defines ‘utility.’ Is that not the State? And, is it not, then, to the State, alone, whom the American citizen must assent to entrust all of morality and ethics? Is it not, then, to the State, alone, whom the American citizen must assent to assign the meaning of “the Good?” And, is not the whole of morality and ethics—“the Good”—bound up in, inextricably tied to the notion of “the Collective as the Supreme Good?” Is not the Collective, then, God?
And, one does not need ask, cannot ask who or what controls “the Collective?” God IS the Collective. The Collective is its own “ Controller,” and the Controller of life and liberty IS the State. And what is “the State?” The State IS Government. They are one and the same.
But, is the State qua Government, not that monstrous entity the Founders of our Republic had, with good reason, to dread? And, had the Founders not carefully thought to design a central, “Federal,” Government” in a manner to constrain its worst tendencies and excesses, so that it would not become the Lord and Master over its true Master, the American people? But, if the State, if this State, THIS Federal Government, cannot be constrained and restrained, and will not allow itself to be constrained and restrained by the people, then the monster the Founders had sought to contain in a carefully constructed cage of Three Co-Equal Branches, would be let loose. And, with the aid of technology and a willingness to pervert the U.S. Constitution, Americans are now witnessing the dreaded power of Government, the Founders’ worst fears realized.
The carefully constructed cage to contain the Beast has failed. A new era in our Country has commenced. Having been infected from the virus of the EU that is infecting all of western civilization, the Cult of the State, a world Government is taking shape. The Founders who had fervently sought to contain this creature, a thing they knew could never be tamed, and so must always remain caged, is now loose, running rampant across America, devouring this Country and all of western civilization.
It is the State, as a massive Collective, a worldwide Government that defines “the Good,” a thing bound up in, inextricably tied to the Collective and where the State has the power to define “the Good,” the State takes on itself the mantle of Deity—the Cult of the State (a world Government) commences, Tyranny writ large.
Had the founders of our Republic thought that caving in, acceding to tyranny would be the best, most propitious, or, at least, the most pragmatic course of action, then this Country, the United States, a free Constitutional Republic—a Country where the people, NOT Government, is sovereign—would never have existed.
Tyrants make very jealous masters. The lust for power is overwhelming but it is ultimately nihilistic, carrying within itself the seeds of its own destruction, but, in the process, bringing everyone and everything down with it; complete Chaos, Armageddon.
THE CENSORING OF FREE SPEECH
Unfortunately, the framers of the Constitution thought, or hoped, that, at the end of the day, a free Press would sound a clarion bell, warning the people about the rise of tyranny in their midst if Government contained in its carefully constructed container, remained quiet, and conformed to the will of the people to whom and for whom it was created. That didn’t happen. That hasn’t happened.
Tyranny did arise, but the Press never warned the public of it. The Press never sounded an alarm to the public. Rather, the Press capitulated to the Tyrant of Government. But, unlike the Tyrants of the past, this new Tyrant is sophisticated. It lurks, silently, unseen, but is omnipresent. The U.S. Constitution means nothing to this Tyrant. This Tyrant has broken through the Cage (the Three Branch System of Government) and lurks outside its Cage, unseen, its harmful effects felt throughout the Nation.
The Constitution of the United States is, for this Tyrant, only a temporary hindrance, a minor annoyance. And the intent of this Tyrant is much more ambitious than control of one Country. This Tyrant has greater ambitions, worldwide ambitions to consolidate all political, social, economic, juridical power in itself. The vast intellectual, military, technological, industrial, and scientific resources of the United States upon which this Tyrant feeds, allows it to grow unchecked. It is difficult to see this Tyrant, except in the faces of the so-called “Open Government” it projects to the public and in the gargantuan awfulness of its effects on the citizenry of the United States and on the Nation’s institutions and on its cultural roots. This Tyranny has a name: “Inverted Totalitarianism,” an expression coined by the political philosopher, Sheldon Wolin.
The expression, “Inverted Totalitarianism,” is an apt one to describe Tyranny of Government worldwide, but if Wolin suspected that this Inverted Totalitarianism would or could extend beyond the confines of the United States, affecting institutional, cultural, juridical structures beyond the geopolitical, financial, and economic of those forces and powers operating secretly in the United States—capturing the whole of western civilization, societally—he did not, apparently say. But the possibility is logically consistent with his concept. And it has come to pass. And a Free Press does not carry the message, doesn’t sound the alarm, doesn’t warn the public, for the Press itself has been taken over by the Tyrants of this Inverted Totalitarian structure that has embraced the United States and the nations of the EU and the Commonwealth nations. The separate parts desire to be merged into a whole.
The United States, though, has something that the other western nation-states do not: A Bill of Rights, a TRUE Bill of Rights, a set of natural law, beyond the control of Government because Government is not the creator of natural law. The right of free speech, the right to dissent, is bound up in autonomy of Self, the Right of the Individual TO BE Individual.
It was the hope of the founders that a free Press, as a component of free Speech, would serve as a vehicle to give voice to the many members of the public but the Press failed to carry the message. So, the people must carry the message themselves, and the Government cannot lawfully constrain that Right. But, how long will free speech—the right of dissent—last? Already speech is censored. Dissent is roundly condemned and callously, perfunctorily squashed. The Government, itself, and through its actors, the major social media companies and major technology companies, operate with impunity outside the bounds of law.
The Government has the power to do so, but not the right to do so. The Constitution is failing to constrain Government.
That leaves one Ace in the Hole: the armed citizen: the last and best hope for a free State and a free and sovereign People. The framers of the Constitution planned well. At the moment, the Government and the Press haven’t instituted measures to inflict a fatal blow on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. They can’t; at least not at this point. The puppet-masters realize it would be suicidal for them to do so; to try; not at this particular juncture. But, the time is getting closer when they will attempt a fatal blow on the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms. And these Tyrants will have no choice.
The concept of a citizen army of the common people is not compatible with tyranny, especially the ambitious tyranny that the puppet-masters sitting at the top of the pyramid have in mind for Americans, and for the populations of western Europe, and for the populations of the rest of the world.
For a comprehensive, insightful, analytical overview of the import and importance of an armed citizenry composed of the common people—today comprising tens of millions of average Americans—see Stephen Halbrook’s essay, titled, “The Right of the People or the Power of the States,” subtitled, “Bearing Arms, Arming Militias, and the Second Amendment.”
The Government is still marshaling its forces; testing the will of the people. And, with the help of the Press, the Government hopes the resolve of the people will soften, weaken—to the point where Tyranny can, at long last, strike the fatal blow against liberty, and, with the quashing of liberty—destroy the American spirit.
The legacy newspapers, in league with the Government, at the behest of the puppet-masters, are whittling away at the peoples’ resolve. How are they doing this and why did it happen? Had the major newspapers been the enemy of the people all along and the people simply failed to notice this? Had the framers of the Constitution placed too much belief in the ability of a free Press to resist the power of the Federal Government? Have the puppet-masters successfully bribed the publishers of the Legacy Press to betray the American people, the Nation, and the U.S. Constitution? Or, have publishers, editors, and reporters, simply fallen prey to the insanity of their own messaging—a belief in Marxism, Neoliberal globalism; societal Nihilism?
It seems now that major legacy newspapers, including The New York Times, New York Daily News, the Jeff Bezos owned Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and USA Today never really intended to function as the honest, reliable source of news that they projected to the public, but simply pretended to function as a reliable news source and as a check on the tyranny of Government. If they ever really did have such goals, they don’t any longer. Even a modicum of pretense at serious news reporting and safeguarding liberty is gone.
Publishers and editors don’t encourage accurate, neutral reporting of the facts, and the Reporters for these newspapers no longer attempt to write news in the sober, neutral language that they may inform the public, engage the intellect, appeal to the rational mind.
Rather, news reports aim at sensationalizing. News accounts distort the facts, omit pertinent details, embellish the facts, or blatantly lie.
Serious news goes missing. These papers routinely publish stories that hide the Harris-Biden Administration failures or bizarrely twist abject failures into successes.
It is clear these newspapers have intentionally colluded with the present Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist Administration and Pelosi-Schumer-Controlled Congress as they all engage in a deliberate campaign of gross deception, targeting the American people.
Government policies and initiatives are designed to undermine the integrity of the Nation’s institutions and the security of the Nation; to hobble the economy, and disrupt society, and harm the health, safety, and well-being of the American people. If Government and the Press direct tax-payer resources against the American people, the Government itself becomes the enemy of the people. The Government itself has committed treason against the people.
Treacherous forces in Government and in the Press were actively at work sabotaging President Trump’s attempts to secure the Country from all threats both foreign and domestic and to take care that all laws of the United States are faithfully executed. Do you see Joe Biden doing this? Is Harris-Biden Administration securing the Country from all threats both foreign and domestic and is he faithfully executing the laws of the United States? Not at all. The Country as an independent sovereign Nation is more weakened, economically, militarily, and geopolitically than at any time in the Nation’s history. Joe Biden carries the title of President of the United States, but he is only nominally the Head of State.
The corrupt and senile Joe Biden is merely the false projection of power of the Executive Branch of Government. His role is that of messenger boy. And it is even doubtful that he even understands the messages that he periodically relays to the public. Often inconsistent in the content of the messaging and incoherent in the delivery of the messaging, it is clear to the American citizenry and to the rest of the world, that Joe Biden is nothing more than a puppet. Joe Biden is nothing more than a stand-in, a cardboard cutout, a storefront fixture for the true decision-makers, the real policymakers, the real rulers: the secretive, powerful, inordinately wealthy, and innately ruthless powers behind the “Open Government” that the public and the rest of the world sees. The “Open Government” is merely a prop, projected onto the Nation and onto the world, nothing more. A sinister “Shadow Government,” whose existence is hinted at through its effects, is where the true power rests. And that Government is opaque, invisible, indiscernible. And its aims and goals and purposes have nothing to do with protecting the Nation and its people from harm and those aims and goals and purposes have nothing to do with serving the needs and interests of the American people. In fact, the aims, goals, and purposes of the hidden rulers, power brokers, and decision-makers are diametrically opposed to the safety and security of the United States and the well-being of its people.
The hidden powers projected their puppet as a political moderate, whatever that means, and as a Grand Unifier. That was just a ruse. And many Americans were taken in by it, accepted the lies; wanted to believe the lies. And, what has occurred: a turbulent weakened America, and in every conceivable way. The American society is crumbling. And it is happening deliberately. And, even in the obvious midst of it, the puppets speak their lines to the American people, blatantly lying to the American people even as Americans see disaster in their lives. The entire society is breaking down, and it is all expected; more, it was desired planned for. It is all part of one grand design. The plan calls for the dismantling of the underpinnings of the Nation in its present form, as a Free Constitutional Republic. Only the shell, the resources, are to remain. And a new regime is to be engineered from the remains. And that remains are to be merged into a new transnational, multicultural governmental scheme. The public nominal faces of power in the Federal Government and in many of the States have provoked rather than ease tensions in society.
Instead of calming tensions, these treacherous forces in both State and Federal Governments, along with the assistance of a seditious Press and of social media, have harnessed the frenetic, frenzied energies of Neo-Marxist and Anarchist agitators to disrupt and to destroy communities across America. It is precisely in vein with the puppet-masters goal of dismantling western nation-states. It continues to this day.
THE JUDICIAL STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED STATES IS ON TRIAL
The circus trial against an innocent young man, Kyle Rittenhouse, is emblematic of the attempt by the Shadow Government to manipulate the citizenry into a frenzy of self-immolation. The ludicrousness of the trial carries a message to all Americans. And the message is that we are all on trial.
Every American who holds to the principles of the Founding Fathers is now treated as a potential terrorist—a Domestic Terrorist.
The puppet-masters have orchestrated an elaborate campaign to destroy the Republic. Our Nation has been turned literally inside out by forces both inside Government and outside it, and both inside the Country and outside it, to create mass confusion and mass hysteria in our society.
The greatest, gravest threat to forces that dare to crush our Country into submission is in the continued existence of the armed American citizen.
To effectively corral a force of tens of millions of armed Americans, it is necessary to create a force of tens of millions of other Americans who have been seduced into surrendering their rights and liberties and to have them contend against each other; to waste their energies on each other. The ground of contention is a phantom Bogeyman: Race Hatred. It is all a myth, and it is nothing new. And it sprang from the mind of a lunatic, Charles Manson. But a maniac can’t convince a rational public to accept an insane delusion. Yet, an insane Government, coordinating with an insane Press, can, for they have the resources in time, and money, and organization, and they have something more: an air of sanity.
Radical Marxist and anarchist riots are routinely portrayed as civilized protests. A young man who attempts to defend business property from the wanton destruction of BLM and Antifa mobs in his father’s town is condemned for doing just that. Enraged the mob turns on the man. His name is Kyle Rittenhouse. The young man retreats, attempting to avoid confrontation. And the police and National Guard are nowhere to be seen. The young man is forced to defend his life—a clear case of armed self-defense if ever there was one—all captured on film just so there is no mistake. The video recordings provide a classic example of the utility of a firearm, and of the right of a human being to defend his life. That is most dramatically in evidence where there are no police around, and a man must take responsibility for his own life, safety, and well-being.
The entire confrontation between a sane, rational, responsible person defending his or her life and a rabid mob that sought to end that life, lasted a few minutes. The mob lost. But, rather than praising the man, the State Government actors condemned it, for the mob was acting under its auspices, bringing about the very destruction of the town that the Government was expected and legally obligated to guard against, but failed to do so, requiring the courageous actions of an average citizen to take up the burden upon himself.
The young man’s actions were heroic: face-to-face contact with at least three people who attempted to kill him. Kyle Rittenhouse was only 17 years old at the time. At 17, Kyle would have required parental consent to enlist in the military. Yet a seasoned soldier couldn’t have performed more appropriately and bravely—and would have warranted a bronze or silver star for that bravery. The bronze star is awarded to members of the armed forces for either heroic achievement, heroic service, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service in a combat zone. The City of Kenosha, Wisconsin that night, was a combat zone. The silver star is awarded to members of the armed forces for gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States. That enemy, intent on destroying a community in America comprised an enraged, mindless mob.
Kyle Rittenhouse deserves commendation for his heroic actions, not condemnation. With virtually no investigation, the Government condemns Kyle Rittenhouse. Casting the young man as the aggressor, despite clear video evidence establishing the contrary, the Government utilizes Rittenhouse as a vehicle to attack civilian possession of firearms and to attack the very principle of self-defense.
Within forty-eight hours the City charges Kyle with the most serious crimes imaginable under Wisconsin law: attempted First-degree intentional homicide; First-degree reckless homicide; First-degree recklessly endangering safety; and, just for good measure, Kyle was charged with “use of a dangerous weapon,” which, as The New York Times pronounces, with obvious glee, “extends the maximum sentence for crimes committed while possessing, using or threatening to use a dangerous weapon. The criminal complaint invokes this provision for all five felony counts; in each case, it could add up to five years to the prison sentence for that count, if Mr. Rittenhouse is convicted.”
But Kyle didn’t receive a military award because he was too young to serve in the military and he wasn’t, ostensibly, in combat with an enemy, because radical, rabid Marxists and Anarchists do not fall within the legal definition of ‘enemy of the United States,’ even thought these rabid Marxists and Anarchists who have made clear their intention to tear down society, all of it, are just that: enemies of the United States. But, that is not how the puppet Harris-Biden Administration portrays them, for they, like the titular Head of State, are playing their roles, as the script requires, and it isn’t necessary that these minor players know that. And, the Shadow Government puppet-masters intend to protect these players, the mob of Marxists and Anarchists who, perhaps, unbeknownst to them, are working against their own interests or what they think is to arise from the ashes of society’s destruction: a Utopian Collectivist Communist State, that will usher in a new era of peace and contentment for the populations of the world, all living together in harmony. It is silly, even nonsensical, in the very conception of it. But, the puppet-masters utilize that myth for it furthers their goal that requires destabilization of all the institutions of society, none more important than the judicial structure of the United States. In a topsy-turvy world, those who would destroy society, the mobs that comprise the Neo-Marxist mobs, are protected, even heralded, while those Americans who attempt to preserve and protect their communities and who seek to preserve a free Constitutional Republic, consistent with the framer’s intentions are treated as anachronistic, reactionary elements, to be treated with scorn.
So, it is that a young man, Kyle Rittenhouse, has become a standard-bearer for those Americans who wish to preserve the Nation in the form the Founders created for it: a free Constitutional Republic. This young man never intended to be a standard-bearer; never wanted to be one, and never would have been one, if the mob had never come to Kenosha, Wisconsin in the first place. Kyle Rittenhouse simply wanted to protect his community and so became the standard-bearer for the preservation of a way of life that the puppet-masters intend to upend.
It is the angry mob that the public sees the Press and, President Joe, and the State Prosecutors defending and, in so doing, the public sees firsthand the abject absurdity of the Government’s position and the audacity of its goal: to undercut the fundamental right of armed self-defense.
The right of armed self-defense—defense of Self through the most effective means available, a firearm—is inextricably bound up with the right of defense.
By undercutting the fundamental right of armed self-defense, the Destructors of a free Constitutional Republic have made abundantly clear their desire to undermine the more inclusive natural law right of defense of self.
And the natural law right of Defense of Self—self-defense—is itself inextricably tied to the most inclusive natural law right of all: the natural law right of autonomy of Selfhood; the sanctity and inviolability of the Soul and Spirit.
The prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse made a mockery of our sacred rights, and, in so doing, tarnished the entire System of Justice.
But the jury, fortunately, saw through the façade manufactured by the prosecutors; a fairy tale story created out of whole cloth: that of an aggressive “active shooter” waging aggressive war on innocent protestors, peacefully protesting for racial justice.
At the end of the day, true Justice did prevail in the case. It was a major case, to be sure. But it is only one case.
Two Branches of the Federal Government are teetering; at the moment the Neo-Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists have control over both, the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch. Only the Third Branch, the Judiciary has a modicum of independence, but with a few individuals on the U.S. Supreme Court and with those in control of the first Two Branches seeking to transform the Third, to bring it and the other Two under one banner, natural law rights are in danger of toppling.
On the law of armed self-defense, outside the home, the U.S. Supreme Court can deal squarely with it, as it impacts the Country, as the issue was originally framed. But the Court can narrow its focus to New York. Since the Roberts’ Court reframed the issue. The Court may leave unsettled the broader issue of the right of armed self-defense outside the home, open, even as the illimitability of the exercise of that Right is implied in the language of the Second Amendment.
Hopefully, in light of the Rittenhouse case, the High Court will, address the need for clear instructions to State and Local Governments, and to the courts, that the right of the people to keep and bear arms does not stop at the doorstep of one’s home.
And just so you know, the humanoid creatures whom Kyle Rittenhouse shot in defense of his life, were upstanding citizens, who, according to Snopes deserve “martyrdom,” even as this Leftist website felt obliged to acknowledge that the individuals whom Kyle shot were convicted felons, whose felonies involved crimes of violence. The left-leaning website Snopes, says:
“And though the rumors about the shooting victims varied in severity and nature, many alleged this: Huber was a known offender of domestic violence and rapist; Rosenbaum had sexually abused children; Grosskreutz had been arrested on suspicion of multiple crimes, including felony burglary, and all three victims were convicted felons. Based on court records and inmate rosters, aspects of those claims were indeed accurate, while others were outright false.”
The website Snopes doesn’t bother to explain what those claims about these three convicted felons are false but wants everyone to know, as it further states, that:
“No evidence showed the victims’ histories had anything to do with the protest, which began as a peaceful showing of people against racism by U.S. law enforcement after a white police officer days prior shot and wounded a Black man, Jacob Blake, who is now paralyzed from the waist down.”
And it all “began as a peaceful showing of people against racism”—and ended up like what, exactly? Snopes’ writers don’t say. And that was the intent all along—peaceful protest? Sure!
And, about Jacob Blake—he, too, is a real gem. As the New York Post reports,
“Blake is accused in the criminal complaint, which was obtained by The Post, of breaking into the home of a woman he knew and sexually assaulting her. . . . Police filed charges against him for felony sexual assault, trespassing and domestic abuse in July when a warrant was issued for his arrest.”
Curiously, of the ostensible “victims” of shootings—violent felons all—no one bothers to mention that Kyle, himself, has no police record. Odd that, isn’t it? The Press, though, plays Kyle as the “Bad Guy.” But, really, he is just the “Fall Guy,” here. But, Rosenbaum was a peach.
By the way, one of the supposed victims, Gaige Grosskreutz, who pointed a loaded gun at Kyle’s head was never charged with any crime for his part. The website, Wisconsin Right Now, reports,
“During dramatic testimony in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, Gaige Grosskreutz, the only man who survived being shot by Rittenhouse, testified he was pointing his gun at Rittenhouse and advancing on him when Rittenhouse shot him.”
“Grosskreutz also admitted that he was carrying a gun, at times stuck into the back of his waist, that night even though his concealed carry permit was expired. It’s illegal to carry a gun concealed in Wisconsin without a permit, but Grosskreutz was never charged with that offense. He said he frequently carried guns at protests because he believes in the Second Amendment.”
It is a curious thing that Grosskreutz, a serial criminal, and convicted felon would claim a right to carry a gun at a protest because he believes in the Second Amendment. Apparently, Grosskreutz doesn’t believe that same right extends to another person, namely a person who would have the audacity to protect himself with a firearm when faced with the imminent threat from Grosskreutz, himself.
Under direct examination, as a prosecution witness, Grosskreutz projected a picture of himself as a real stand-up guy. 5Chicago news reports,
“ ‘I thought the defendant was an active shooter,’ the 27-year-old Grosskreutz said. Asked what was going through his mind as he got closer to the 17-year-old Rittenhouse, he said, ‘That I was going to die.’
Rittenhouse shot Grosskreutz in the arm, tearing away much of his bicep — or ‘vaporized’ it, as the witness put it.
Rittenhouse, now 18, is on trial on charges of killing two men and wounding Grosskreutz. The one-time police youth cadet from Antioch, Illinois, had gone to Kenosha with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle and a medical kit in what he said was an effort to safeguard property from the violent demonstrations that broke out over the shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man, by a white Kenosha police officer.
Prosecutors have portrayed Rittenhouse as the instigator of the bloodshed. His lawyers have argued that he acted in self-defense. He could get life in prison if convicted of the most serious charges against him.
Under questioning from the prosecution, Grosskreutz said he had his hands raised as he closed in on Rittenhouse and didn’t intend to shoot the young man. Prosecutor Thomas Binger asked Grosskreutz why he didn’t shoot first.
‘That’s not the kind of person that I am. That’s not why I was out there,’ he said. ‘It’s not who I am. And definitely not somebody I would want to become.’”
That was under Direct examination.
“But during cross-examination, Rittenhouse defense attorney Corey Chirafisi asked: ‘It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him . . . that he fired, right?’
‘Correct,’ Grosskreutz replied. The defense also presented a photo showing Grosskreutz pointing the gun at Rittenhouse, who was on the ground with his rifle pointed up at Grosskreutz.
Wisconsin municipal code prohibits the carrying of a concealed weapon.
And it should be noted, that, unlike Grosskreutz, Kyle Rittenhouse wasn’t carrying a firearm concealed. But Rittenhouse was charged initially with carrying a firearm when it was perfectly legal for him to do so. Yet Grosskreutz, for his part, was carrying a handgun concealed. There was no question about it, and he admitted as much. Grosskreutz had broken Wisconsin law. But he was never charged with a crime for doing so. The administration of Justice is broken on that score, but the puppet-masters intended to protect him because he was a worthwhile pawn in a game of destabilizing American society, planned for, orchestrated, and executed by the puppet-masters of the Shadow Government.
- Sec. 50-32 Carrying concealed weapons prohibited; certain weapons prohibited.
Concealed weapons prohibited.
(1) Prohibition. No person shall, within the city, wear or in any manner carry under his clothes or conceal upon or about his person any weapons or dangerous weapon, provided this subsection shall not apply to a peace officer or such persons as may be authorized to carry such weapons.
(2) Dangerous weapon defined. The term ‘dangerous weapon’ means any firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, or any device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm, or any other device or instrumentality which, in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.
And the Wisconsin Criminal Code mandates charges against Grosskreutz as follows:
941.20. Endangering safety by use of dangerous weapon.
(1) Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor:
(a) Endangers another’s safety by the negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon.
And isn’t there concrete, convincing, undisputed, evidence to support a showing that Grosskreutz assaulted Rittenhouse with a deadly weapon with a clear intent to kill Kyle Rittenhouse? See Fells vs. State, 65 Wis. 2d 525 (Wis. 1974).
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin opined,
“There is a general legal presumption that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of his acts. Where the act is assault with a deadly weapon, the presumption is that the person intended to kill. In Austin v. State this court approved the following jury instruction which was used in the instant case:
‘Wis J I—Criminal, Part II, 1105, states and we approve the following as an accurate statement of the law:
“ ‘. . . . If one person (assaults another violently with a dangerous weapon, likely to kill), . . . then when there are no circumstances to prevent or rebut the presumption, the legal and natural presumption is that death was intended.’”
Wasn’t it clear from the video evidence and from Grosskreutz’s own admissions in open Court that in pointing a gun at Kyle Rittenhouse’s head, the legal and natural presumption is that Grosskreutz intended to kill Kyle Rittenhouse? And, given that natural presumption from the evidence and testimony of Grosskreutz, two inferences can and ought to be made: one, that Grosskreutz intended to kill Rittenhouse, and Kyle Rittenhouse had reasonably concluded that Grosskreutz intended to do just that. Yet, the State never charged Grosskreutz with the attempted murder of Kyle Rittenhouse. Didn’t the prosecutors know the import of Wisconsin law on a natural presumption of death if a person assaults another person with a dangerous weapon? Of course, they did. Yet the State charged Kyle Rittenhouse with attempted first-degree intentional homicide in shooting Gaige Grosskreutz. But, the State never charged Gaige Grosskreutz with the same crime for pointing a loaded, concealed handgun at Kyle Rittenhouse. Why is that? Did it have to do with the fact that Kyle Rittenhouse happened to shoot Grosskreutz before he shot Kyle? But, if Kyle Grosskreutz had gotten the upper hand, likely Kyle would have been seriously injured or, worse, dead. And, given that Wisconsin law makes clear a presumption that Grosskreutz intended to kill Kyle, as Kyle never aimed and shot his rifle at Grosskreutz until Grosskreutz aimed his handgun at Kyle Rittenhouse, as testimony in Court proved, Grosskreutz should, at the outset, have been charged with the very crime that the State charged Kyle with, and Kyle should never have been charged at all as his claim of justified self-defense would be implied, and moot, based on video evidence proved and the State’s own interview of Grosskreutz would have certainly borne out.
But, so it goes in a Government gone mad. Innocent people are charged with a crime because they represent America as the framers of the Constitution intended. Imagine that! But, Americans are now living in an America that the puppet-masters intend to destroy.
Marxist and Anarchist agitators will be and are routinely protected by the Government, both by the Federal Government and by friendly “Blue” State and Municipal Governments. They are either let free from detention without the need to post bail, regardless of the heinousness of the arrest warrant and regardless of the inherent danger they pose to society or they fail to be charged with a crime, at all.
But, then these sociopathic Marxists and Anarchists, including outright psychopathic freaks, bent on destroying life and property are given free rein to indulge their dangerous urges passions. Maybe they are on the active payroll of the Federal Government or secretive contractors of the Government; maybe not. It doesn’t matter.
The present rogue, treacherous Administration, along with an equally treacherous Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist-Controlled Congress intend to dismantle a free Constitutional Republic. That much is clear. It is also clear that a radical, rabid mob, assists in that effort.
And, this concerted, elaborate, multi-layered plan—really a decades-long, project, with its origins going back centuries, as a response by the Central Banking empire builders in Great Britain to the overthrow of British rule by the American colonies through the successful American Revolution of 1776—involves an extraordinary cast of characters.
There are the present-day powerful, wealthy, shadowy puppet-masters, themselves that would certainly include the descendants of the original Rothschild Banking clan, the creators of the Central Banking system that has infected the major nation-states around the world, along with wealthy industrialists and the nouveau riche technology Billionaire class who have joined the conspiracy to overthrow the present political western nation-state system. Next, there are the public faces of the puppet-masters, the messengers who deliver the obfuscations, deflections, diversions, double-talk, and outright lies and fluff, to hide the true objectives of the puppet-masters and to explain away evident policy “failures” as due to unforeseen events, unfortunate happenstances, anomalies, or that embrace a flurry of factors that rest beyond the power of the “Open Government” to navigate, to deal with, or compensate for.
In some cases, these “Open Government” puppets will baldly, blatantly, arrogantly lie to the American public, denying the truth of something that cannot reasonably, rationally be denied. For example, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Alejandro Mayorkas will deny that there is no Open Borders policy and that the Southern Border of the United States, isn’t open, notwithstanding video footage demonstrating that the Southern Border is wide open; that thousands of illegal aliens are streaming through the Border every month, and that, since the beginning of the year, close to two million more illegal aliens walked through the Southern Border and are residing in the United States.
Sometimes “Open Government” puppets, like Jen Psaki, will perfunctorily dismiss out-of-hand outright inconsistencies in policies.
Once, when Fox News Reporter Peter Doocy questioned the Harris-Biden Administration’s draconian COVID vaccination requirement for citizens but no COVID vaccination requirement for migrants at the border, Jen Psaki responded at once blithely and curtly, “that’s correct,” and moved on to another reporter before Peter Doocy could ask a follow-up.
The “Open Government” stooges will often pass off incontrovertible failures as roaring successes. Case in point, the “Grand Unifier,” Joe Biden, insists that the disastrous withdrawal of Afghanistan was “an extraordinary success.”
And, the “Open Government” puppet, Merrick Garland, Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney General has the gall, during a Congressional hearing of the Judiciary Committee, to callously lie to Congressional Republicans that the DOJ/FBI isn’t “tagging,” American parents, treating Americans as terrorists for purpose of blatant harassment.
The number of instances of callous, caustic, contemptuous, and cavalier behavior toward Americans, exhibited by the Shadow/Dark Government puppet-masters through their toadies in the “Open Government” is now so prevalent and so perverse that a reasonable person cannot help but infer that there the puppet-masters can drop the “Open Government” pretense facade. This marks an important turning point for our Country. The puppet-masters have, in recent months, felt confident that they have consolidated the necessary threshold of power over the Country that they need not bother wasting further time devising strategies to mislead or to placate the public. In any event, the use of such strategies would prove futile. The public is well aware that the Government no longer considers itself to be a servant of the people and so has made clear enough that it no longer needs to answer to the people and that pretending to do so would only serve to make foster further anger among the electorate.
The transformation of the Country toward Collectivist totalitarianism cannot be rationally denied and the timetable for doing so is back on track and moving apace.
The puppet-masters have captured much of the ground previously lost during the Trump years. The worst that can be said about those lost years from the standpoint of the puppet-masters, is that the entire Nation is now well aware of the game. It is no longer a matter of suspicion.
The goal of the puppet-masters, to dismantle a free Constitutional Republic, to merge the remains of the Country into a mammoth political, social, economic, juridical, multicultural, transnational governmental scheme is now beyond plausible deniability as a mere conspiracy theory. In fact, the expression, “new world order,” a short descriptor of the agenda, is no longer denied, shrugged off, or treated with levity by the puppet-masters and their toadies.
As the puppet-masters stooges in governments around the world, are themselves are regularly utilizing the expression, expressly asserting it, or clearly alluding to it in their remarks, the puppet-masters have evidently given the go-ahead to do so. So, understandably, the use of the expression by the average person uttering it is no longer treated with the customary derision and condescension.
The plot to weaken and dismantle the political, social, economic, juridical, and economic systems and institutions of these nation-states, along with the history, heritage, ethos, and ethical/moral grounding of those nation-states—the substantive fabric upon which a cohesive, coherent national identity exists, without which a nation-state ceases to exist—is upon this Nation and upon all nation-states. The concept of the modern ‘nation-state’ has been the salient glue binding western civilization for at least 300 years, and it is rapidly coming to a close, a screeching halt as the tenets, precepts, and principles of Collectivism, grounded on a completely different societal structure is coming to fruition.
The American people do not have control over, nor should they have control over, the political, social, economic, juridical, and cultural governmental, and societal structures adopted by other populations. But, by the same token, we should not be strapped into another socio/political system. But, as the Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist agenda requires the dissolution of all nation-states, the fate of ours logically is implicated.
Must an adult rely on a child to blurt out the truth? Must an adult be afraid to openly defy a renegade Government, when doing so requires merely that an adult assert the “naked” truth of what he knows to be true?
Must he play along with everyone else and deny the emperor is wearing clothes when he knows the emperor is not? Is the tale of the Emperor Has No Clothes merely a child’s parable, for a child? Is this not an important question, especially today. Is not the public being told that the Emperor has no clothes?
Well, consider, everyone knows that there are two sexes: male and female. Is that not true? And, if not, if there are more than two genders, then how many, in fact, are there?
One site now posits 81. Is that a joke? Is it part of a comedy routine? Can a comedian even joke about that sort of thing today?
Think back 20 years ago. Would such an idea be not only perverse but so incongruous, as to be of no use even for a comedy routine? Yet, today, the concept of gender is not merely a matter for academic discussion. Its impact is felt in society. It has even infected our public schools.
And, quibbling about whether the term ‘gender’ is or is not equivalent to ‘sex’ is missing the point.
The import behind the attempt is what is important here. The Intent is to confuse the mind. And, why is that?
The Neo-Marxist/Neoliberal Globalist goal is to dismantle the Republic. To accomplish that task it is necessary to disrupt the underpinnings of our society.
That society is predicated on the tenets, precepts, and principles of Individualism and on the Judeo-Christian ethic, not the amoral tenets, precepts, and principles of Collectivism, pervading society, permeating throughout it. The manipulation of language plays an important part in the attempt to transform America into a Collectivist Dictatorship.
Language offers a more emphatic and critical need for serious discussion. For political theorists and sociologists, the politic0/socio import of reshaping language is important. It is certainly important to the Destroyers of a free Constitutional Republic. It is important for the Destroyers of our Nation to change our perception of it; of its basic underpinnings. Manipulation of language becomes an important tool in the arsenal of those forces bent on dismantling a free Republic.
If language is perception, and reality is built on perception, and a million people say the emperor is wearing fine apparel, when he is stark naked, is this delusion then to be taken as reality? Perhaps not; probably not. But, if a few sane people exist in a Nation that has gone insane, who claim to see the emperor as he really is, “in the buff,” and dare to say it is so, these rational individuals will not be long tolerated in a Country that has gone mad. They must play along, just as the masses have played along. But, through time, the delusion becomes more entrenched. And as more and more people seemingly “buy into” the delusion, to avoid negative repercussions for pointing out the delusion, then the distinction between reality and illusion will truly become blurred, distorted, and at some point, the intellect will not be able to tell the two apart.
The few outliers must agree to play along, just as the masses have played along, pretending, at first, to see that the emperor is fully draped and in his finest apparel, and to acknowledge that it is so, lest they be targeted for special and unpleasant treatment.
Perhaps, at some point in time, the world of illusion will become reality. If society’s laws and mores and behaviors reflect 81 genders or 181, or what have you, then the notion of two sexes becomes an archaic concept. It has no practical significance. Compunctions of custom and consensus of opinion mandate a new order of reality, and that reality dictates thoughts and beliefs; habits, and actions.
But, we are not quite there, yet. Sanity may still prevail.
Many Americans are coming to perceive of imminent threat the Marxist/Globalist poses to the preservation of a free Constitutional Republic. Americans see that the Marxist/Globalist aims are not compatible with natural law rights that go unchecked. One or the other must go.
The tenets, precepts, and principles of Marxism/Globalism require are incompatible with natural law rights. And so the Marxists and Globalists censor free speech and constrain free association, and undermine the right of personal autonomy, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and restrict one’s control over one’s own personal property.
And Americans are also coming to see that the Marxists and Globalists abhor one natural law right over all the others: the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Marxists and Globalists view the right of the people to keep and bear arms as not only dangerous to their well-ordered, tightly controlled society, but incoherent. For, the language of the Second Amendment implies that the people are sovereign over Government. That notion is the obverse of that held by Marxists and Globalists because, for them, Government is the supreme sovereign. For them, hundreds of millions of common people are merely viewed as cattle and the idea that cattle should be allowed to keep and bear arms is an anathema to them.
Marxists and the Neoliberal Globalist “elites” view the very concept of ‘natural law rights’ as inimical to the maintenance of a well-ordered Collectivist society they envision.
And, in fact, the exercise of basic natural law Rights is dangerous to a society that is predicated on principles that have no use for them because the continued exercise of them would upend a rigidly controlled society.
The armed citizenry is seen as especially dangerous to the Collectivist society. Anyone who insists on arming him or herself will be seen and is coming to be seen as engaging in behavior considered toxic to the operation of a well-ordered Collectivist society. And the public, from child to adult, is slowly, methodically, inexorably being conditioned to perceive guns and the wish to exercise one’s right to keep and bear them in defense of one’s self, home, family business, and as the ultimate fail-safe mechanism to thwart tyranny as an anathema, as a neurotic or psychotic aberration that is not be condoned.
The insanity of a renegade Federal Government isn’t going to cure itself. And the failure of the public to recognize and acknowledge the insanity of a renegade Government will only serve to entrench all the postulates of an insane Government on the psyche of the American people.
The illness will only get progressively worse, the rot infecting more and more of the Nation until the Nation dies. It happened to Rome. But, then, Rome didn’t have access to modern information technology. Nor did the civilization of Rome see advances in communication. Nor did Rome have access to precise social engineering tools, or knowledge of psychology and neurology and other neurosciences that has made possible the Government’s ability to successfully indoctrinate, “reeducate,” and condition the minds of the people, and on an industrial scale.
Pay close attention to the manner in which the Government, the Press, and social media handle the Rittenhouse case. And pay close attention, in the next several months, to the weaponization of the Department of Justice as it begins to target more and more average citizens.
And pay particular attention, in the next several months, to Governmental policies that slowly and increasingly negatively impact speech, gun rights, privacy, and the application of justice.
The seditious Press and its fellow travelers in the network and cable news have regularly persisted in posting deliberate lies, misinformation, and selected information to sway public opinion against the Rittenhouse case and to encourage mob retaliation against any verdict the Marxist and Anarchist rabble happen to disagree with. And, now, a major cable news organization, MSNBC, has gone a step further, intimidating the jury, in that case, is a serious crime. The New York Post just reported the following:
“The judge presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial banned MSNBC from the courtroom on Thursday after a man claiming to be a producer for the network was accused of following jurors.
The man, who identified himself as James Morrison, was pulled over Wednesday after he allegedly blew a red light while pursuing a bus that transports jurors from the Kenosha County Courthouse, Judge Bruce Schroeder said.
“He stated that he had been instructed by [a superior] in New York to follow the jury bus,” Schroeder said.
Police confirmed Thursday that there was an “incident with a person who is alleging to be affiliated with a national media outlet” and the suspect was issued several traffic citations.
“Police suspect this person was trying to photograph jurors. This incident is being investigated much further,” police said.
Schroeder called the incident an “extremely serious matter” and barred any journalists from MSNBC from attending the ongoing trial.”
The puppet-masters through their toadies will continue to aggressively attack anything they find detrimental to their intention, goal, desire to destroy the Republic. Even the sanctity of the Judicial system in the United States is considered fair game to these powerful, ruthless forces. They are getting the Marxist and Anarchist rabble to once again unleash its mindless, senseless, radical, and rabid vindictiveness against a City and against the Country.
Many Americans are beginning to fight back, asserting their sovereignty over the Government. They are beginning to fight back against the concerted effort by Government, by the Press, and by other malevolent forces, intent on destroying the Republic.
The U.S. Supreme Court can assist in this effort through the Bruen case. A strong, unequivocal statement of the right of armed defense outside the home would go a long way in strengthening the Nation’s Bill of Rights upon which the American people depend to maintain their sovereignty over the Government.
Copyright © 2021 Roger J Katz (Towne Criour), Stephen L. D’Andrilli (Publius) All Rights Reserved.
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.