DID THE FEDERAL COURTS IN THE FOURTH CIRCUIT BETRAY AMERICA’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS? IT APPEARS SO.
MARYLAND’S FIREARM SAFETY ACT: ATTACKING THE CORE OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT THROUGH THE VENEER OF PROMOTING PUBLIC SAFETY. KOLBE VS. HOGAN PART TEN Despite the need for deference to our federal and State court systems, we must speak out and […]Read More
PART THREE THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND EMPLOYED THE WRONG STANDARD OF REVIEW IN FINDING THAT MARYLAND’S DRACONIAN FIREARM SAFETY ACT IS LAWFUL. The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case, District of Columbia vs. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 […]Read More
“Bubble Guns” In The Fourth Circuit Take Pot Shots At Heller In The Circuit’s Poorly Reasoned Opinion PART ONE THE KOLBE CASE: INTRODUCTION On February 21, 2017, antigun establishment judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit […]Read More
The ultimate goal of the antigun movement is this: the universal elimination of civilian firearms’ ownership and possession. This is true and incontrovertible. Everything the antigun movement does is directed to the attainment of that goal. Nothing the antigun movement […]Read More
A COURT OF LAW THAT REJECTS U.S. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT UNDERMINES THE RULE OF LAW AND UNDERCUTS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS DEFIES U.S. SUPREME COURT HOLDINGS IN HELLER AND MCDONALD AND SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS BOWS TO THE WILL OF GOVERNMENT IN FRIEDMAN CASE State governments and local governments that enact or establish antigun laws, […]Read More