A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF GREG KELLY’S “JUSTICE FOR ALL”: PREFACE TO A DETAILED EXPOSITION OF EACH CHAPTER OF THE BOOK

A MULTIPART ESSAY, PREPARED BY STEPHEN L. D’ANDRILLI, PRESIDENT AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE ARBALEST GROUP, LLC., CREATOR OF THE ARBALEST QUARREL WEBSITE

PART THREE

DETAILED EXPOSITION AND EXAMINATION OF EACH CHAPTER OF KELLY’S “JUSTICE FOR ALL”, WITH INFERENCES DRAWN, POSTULATIONS DERIVED, AND COMMENTARY PROFFERED FROM A PERUSAL OF THE BOOK

SUBPART A

UPDATED: OPENING REMARKS (PREFACE TO ANALYSIS OF EACH CHAPTER)

What makes Kelly’s book “Justice For All” a delight to read is that he not only provides well-documented observations to support his finding THAT the “RADICAL LEFT” presents not only a DANGEROUS THREAT and CALAMITOUS AGENCY of DESTRUCTION to the continued EXISTENCE of our Nation as a TRULY FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, BUT in the manner he expresses his observations.

Through time many of his assertions may well evolve into adages for the public for reflection.

After a careful reading of the book and through further careful analysis of various sections of the text, I have also found a common theme.

THE CENTRAL THEME OF “JUSTICE FOR ALL——

THE CENTRAL THEME involves drawing out the ACTIONS AND AIMS of the RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS.

These NEO-MARXISTS have, by the way, effectively abandoned and disavowed “CLASSICAL MARXISM.” See remarks, infra.

NEO-MARXISTS espouse a NOVEL BRAND of Marxism—RACIALISM, ESSENTIALISM, and MULTICULTURALISM—things that have nothing to do with CLASSICAL MARXISM, yet are the essence of NEO-MARXISM, the raison d’être of NEO-MARXISM, without which it would have no basis, no reason, to exist.

THESE THREE DOCTRINES—RACIALISM, ESSENTIALISM, and MULTICULTURALISM—ARE THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEO-MARXIST DOGMA AND IDEOLOGY, AND THE RATIONALE BEHIND THEIR ATTACK ON AMERICA, THEIR ATTACK ON A FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

THE CENTRAL CONCLUSION DRAWN IN “JUSTICE FOR ALL——

Apart from the central theme of “JUSTICE FOR ALL,” Kelly makes an impressive case for an interesting inference, ALBEIT A TACIT ONE, WHICH IS——

It is wrong to think of the destructive tendencies and actions of NEO-MARXISTS as having proceeded from a series of UNCONNECTED ONE-OFF, spontaneous EVENTS, or HAPPENSTANCES in twenty-first-century America. THESE ARE NOT ONE-OFF UNCONNECTED OCCURRENCES. THEY ARE ALL BOUND TOGETHER.

Perhaps such ONE-OFF tragic events, happenstances, or occurrences are how all this mess started in the previous century.

BUT, TODAY, there is a common thread, cogency, and agency to these VARIOUS TRAGIC STATES OF AFFAIRS.

THE NEO-MARXISTS EMPLOY THESE TACTICALLY—MANIFESTING AS RIOTS AND OTHER VIOLENT ACTS, WHICH TAKE ON THE APPEARANCE OF SPONTANEITY.

THAT SPONTANEITY IS ILLUSION.

A SPECIFIC EVENT APPEARS TO “CAUSE” RIOTS and other VIOLENT ACTS TO OCCUR SPONTANEOUSLY ACROSS AMERICA. But the impact from the SEEMING ONE-OFF EVENT (OR EVENTS) DOESN’T END. IT HAS A CASCADING EFFECT THAT TOUCHES UPON EVERY FACET OF OUR NATION’S LIFE—LAYING WASTE TO EVERYTHING INDISPENSABLE TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE AND INDISPENSABLE TO AMERICAN IDENTITY.

EACH SEEMING ONE-OFF EVENT BUILDS ON THE LAST, CREATING A CRESCENDO OF CONSTANT VIOLENCE AND THREAT OF VIOLENCE THAT NEVER ENDS. AND THAT IS ALL BY DESIGN. THE VIOLENCE IS NOT EXPECTED TO END UNTIL THE NATION IS BROUGHT TO ITS KNEES.

THIS IS THE RADICAL LEFT COUNTERREVOLUTION AND IT IS DIRECTED TO THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION OF 1776.

THE NEO-MARXISTS NEED SOCIETAL VIOLENCE. AND THEY NEED TO KEEP AMERICANS ON EDGE, IN A CONSTANT STATE OF FEAR, AND ANXIETY, AND AGITATION.

Americans have witnessed, and continue to witness, ORCHESTRATED EXPLOITATION of TRAGEDIES THAT SEEMINGLY HAPPEN AT RANDOM AND BY ACCIDENT. SOME TRAGEDIES DO OCCUR BY ACCIDENT. BUT, OFTEN THEY BEAR TELL-TALE SIGNS OF HAVING BEEN FABRICATED.

WHETHER A TRAGEDY OCCURS BY ACCIDENT—THE PRODUCT, SAY, OF A “LONE WOLF, ” TRULY OPERATING ALONE—OR IS MANUFACTURED, DELIBERATELY PROVOKED BY RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS, USING AND TRIGGERING THE DESTRUCTIVE IMPULSES OF A PSYCHOPATH OR UNSTABLE, DANGEROUS PSYCHOTIC TO LASH OUT, THE RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS THEN ATTACH A SPECIFIC MEANING TO THE OCCURRENCE OF A TRAGEDY, and CONVERT THAT TRAGEDY INTO A SERIES OF SELF-SERVING NARRATIVES.

THE RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS INFUSE THOSE NARRATIVES, TOO, WITH MEANING—SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PUBLIC CONSUMPTION.

These NARRATIVES operate as IMPERATIVES FOR ACTION, DIRECTED TO A BROAD SWATH OF AMERICANS, many of whom FALL PREY TO THE MESSAGING, AND ONCE SEDUCED BY THE MESSAGING, BECOME WILLING SLAVES TO NEO-MARXISM, ACOLYTES OF THE NEO-MARXIST CAUSE.

These IMPERATIVES FOR ACTION become operational INSTRUMENTS, AND MECHANISMS—THE MEANS THROUGH WHICH DISINTEGRATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY PROCEEDS.

THIS is what the “RADICAL LEFT” wants.

THIS is what it yearns to accomplish.

THIS is what it intends to manifest into reality.  

The RADICAL LEFT IMPERATIVES FOR ACTION and the INSTRUMENTS and MECHANISMS utilized to achieve their aims are grounded on a rationale.

This rationale serves as moral justification for the RADICAL LEFT to continue their campaign of rampant violent crime directed against the American people, their culture, and their Nation’s institutions.

And, all of this is done in furtherance of the RADICAL LEFT’s long-term strategy, aimed at wearing down the public, eventually bringing about the social, political, and economic collapse of the United States in furtherance of their agenda and in service to their aims.  

The NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS are a major component of the RADICAL LEFT, as a DYNAMIC FORCE, corrupting the Nation and demoralizing the citizenry. We lay out the components of the “RADICAL LEFT” in PART ONE of my ESSAY.

THREE PROMINENT SUBCOMPONENTS of the Marxist Cultists include:

  • A “PSEUDO-RELIGIOUS” ARM

  • AN “ACTION” ARM

  • A “CONTENT DELIVERY” ARM

The NEO-MARXIST CULTIST “PSEUDO-RELIGIOUS” ARM embraces ostensible “SCHOLARS” (ACADEMICIANS). These are the theorists and ideologues of the movement.

Kelly names prominent figures among them and discusses their illogical, inconsistent, incoherent socio-political philosophies.

Examples of the NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS “ACTION” ARM include VIOLENT AGITATORS AND PROVOCATEURS.

“BLACK LIVES MATTER,” oft described by the three-letter acronym, “BLM,” is one major organization. Another is the ANARCHIST GROUP referred to colloquially as “ANTIFA,”—a loose, decentralized network of psychopathic militants. Kelly discusses these, as well.

The NEO-MARXIST CULTIST “CONTENT DELIVERY ARM” is a third subcomponent of the NEO-MARXIST RADICAL LEFT.

This ARM includes The “FREE” PRESS—the Mainstream Media (“MSM)—and several CABLE and BROADCAST “NEWS” ORGANS. This ARM also includes major PUBLISHING HOUSES and large and small WEBSITES and PODCASTS.

Examples of the MSM PRESS include the NEW YORK TIMES, the WASHINGTON POST, the LOS ANGELES TIMES, and USA TODAY.

Examples of Neo-Marxist Cultist CABLE AND BROADCAST “NEWS ORGANS, include CNN, MSNBC, PBS, ABC, NBC, CBS, THE YOUNG TURKS, and DEMOCRACY NOW.

Major Neo-Marxist WEBSITES, include the HUFFINGTON POST, ALTERNET, COMMON DREAMS, BUZZ FEED, DAILY KOS, THE DAILY BEAST, POLITICO, WORLD SOCIALIST WEBSITE, RAW STORY, COUNTER PUNCH, VOX, and  THINK PROGRESS.

Major Neo-Marxist PERIODICALS and MAGAZINES include THE ATLANTIC, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, MOTHER JONES, TIME, NEWSWEEK, and VANITY FAIR. There is also an array of NEO-MARXIST ACADEMIC JOURNALS such as JACOBIN, NEW LEFT REVIEW, and FIGHT RACISM. Also, see Antipode online for a more expansive listing.

Major Neo-Marxist PUBLISHERS include AK PRESS, VERSO, HAYMARKET PRESS, MONTHLY REVIEW PRESS, THE PERMANENT PRESS, VERNON PRESS, AND CHARLES H. KERR PUBLISHING COMPANY.

I have provided just a few examples of the aforementioned third subcomponent of the NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS and there is a lot of overlap as some operate in more than one venue.

The NEO-MARXIST CULTIST CONTENT DELIVERY SYSTEM provides cover for the crimes of NEO-MARXIST AGITATORS and PROVOCATEURS and provides the mechanism for the expansive delivery of RADICAL LEFT PROPAGANDA across the Country to the target population.

IS THERE ANY WONDER THAT SUCH A DANGEROUS AND PATENTLY ABSURD MOVEMENT HAS MADE SUCH HEADWAY IN OUR COUNTRY AND HAS HAD SO MUCH SUCCESS IN CONVERTING THE THOUGHT PROCESSES OF SO MANY AMERICANS?

The job of these three SUBCOMPONENTS of the NEO-MARXIST COMPONENT of the RADICAL LEFT is: ONE, TO CREATE the ideological underpinnings of NEO-MARXISM, and TWO, TO PROVOKE and RATIONALIZE constant mayhem, injury, and violence across America, and THREE, to DISPERSE the MESSAGE of the NEO-MARXIST CAUSE across America, to the greatest number of people possible, creating MOB PSYCHOSIS—AN AMERICAN ELECTORATE THAT DOESN’T STOP TO THINK AND REFLECT, BUT ONLY REACT TO STIMULUS PROJECTED ONTO ITS PSYCHE—the EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING DIRECTED TO THE ENTIRE POPULACE.

The NEO-MARXIST falsely conveys a message that the ELECTORATE is thinking for itself. The ELECTORATE DOES NO SUCH THING.

IT HAS FALLEN VICTIM TO MASS HYPNOSIS BROUGHT ABOUT BY DRUMMING INTO THE MIND A SERIES OF SIMPLISTIC MESSAGES, OPERATING AS VIRAL MEMES IN THE PSYCHE. Many Americans are inured to this. But many more are not.

The NEO-MARXISTS have become very, very good at manipulating broad swaths of the public and producing, prompting, and provoking, mayhem, injury, and violence in society and thereupon rationalizing their actions as morally sound.

RATIONALIZATION FOR THIS MAYHEM, INJURY, AND VIOLENCE, IS THE JOB OF THE PRESS.

THE PRESS either excuses and masks these crimes as JUSTIFIED ACTS OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, or THE PRESS denies the occurrence of violence outright—some referring to violent criminal activity as MOSTLY “PEACEFUL PROTESTS,” as fiery destruction occurs in the background. See Fox News panning of CNN’s news report.

BLM and ANTIFA have international roots, and there are undoubtedly other groups operating in the Nation as well—many of them offshoots of BLM and ANTIFA, likely spawned by them and mimicking them.

And then there are the psychopaths and dangerous psychotic lunatic LONE WOLVES, spurred to act by the incessant goading, prodding, and facilitating of THE PRESS, and, perhaps, deliberately conditioned by the Radical Left psychologists to engage in violence and murder when activated.  

The RADICAL LEFT thinkers and planners have no doubt factored in a massive public outcry, supporting the dissolution of society.

THIS IS NOT ONLY HELPFUL IT IS NECESSARY.

THE RADICAL LEFT REQUIRES PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF THE VIOLENCE GENERATED. THEY HOPE AND TRUST THAT BROAD SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION WILL TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THEIR SOCIETY IN DETRIMENT TO THEIR OWN LIFE AND WELL-BEING, OR, AT LEAST, WILL ACQUIESCE TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THEIR SOCIETY, REFRAINING FROM PREVAILING ON THEIR LEGISLATORS TO STAMP OUT THE UNRESTRAINED, DEFIANT, SHAMELESS DEBASEMENT AND RUINATION OF THEIR SOCIETY.

As large, diverse, and powerful as it is, the Radical Left cannot destroy society on its own.

The disintegration of a prosperous, successful, thriving society requires tens or hundreds of thousands of participants to that disintegration of society, and tens of millions more docile sheep standing around, allowing the rape of their Country and themselves to occur.

What Americans are witnessing today is, then, something much more sinister than anything the “RADICAL LEFT” has orchestrated in the past.

A concerted effort is afoot here to destroy THE VERY FABRIC OF SOCIETY: to abolish every major institution in America—to disturb and to disrupt, to deface, deform and disfigure, to damage and eradicate every vestige, every trace of—

  •  OUR HISTORY, HERITAGE, AND CULTURE,

  • OUR NATIONAL ETHOS,

  • OUR SYSTEM OF LAWS AND JURISPRUDENCE,

  • OUR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MORAL GROUNDING,

  • OUR EMBLEMS, ARTIFACTS, AND ART, OUR STATUES, MONUMENTS, AND MEMORIALS, AND OUR NATIONAL HOLIDAYS OF REMEMBRANCE,

  • OUR NATION’S CORE VALUES,

  • OUR NATIONAL IDENTITY,

  • OUR BELIEF IN THE SANCTITY AND INVIOLABILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL, AND CONCOMITANTLY,

  • OUR BELIEF IN OUR FUNDAMENTAL, UNALIENABLE, UNMODIFIABLE, ILLIMITABLE, ETERNAL NATURAL LAW RIGHTS THAT PREEXIST IN MAN AND THAT REST WELL BEYOND THE LAWFUL POWER OF THE STATE TO IGNORE, ABROGATE, REPEAL, DISPOSE OF, DISPOSSESS OUR PEOPLE OF,  TAMPER WITH IN ANY MANNER.

THE NEO-MARXISTS ARE ONE COMPONENT OF WHAT I HAVE FOUND TO EMBRACE THREE PRIMARY ELEMENTS.

I have delineated and described the components of the RADICAL LEFT in PART ONE of this MULTISERIES ESSAY.

These THREE ELEMENTS, comprising the “RADICAL LEFT,” amount to a TRAVESTY, PERVERSITY, and ABSURDITY of NATURE.

The expression, “RADICAL LEFT” is an apt, non-pejorative, neutral descriptor for a mammoth and undisguisedly ruthless community of conspirators working at times separately but often in concert, whose singular aim is the OVERTHROW of our Country as a SINGULARLY POWERFUL, SECURE and STABLE, and PROSPEROUS INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE and FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

In furtherance of that objective, the Radical Left is hellbent on disassembling the institutions of the Nation, ERADICATING our Nation’s HISTORY, HERITAGE, and CULTURE, ERASING our Nation’s unique BILL OF RIGHTS, CORRALLING, and SUBJUGATING the POPULACE, and REDUCING the POPULACE to an acute, abject state of PENURY, thereby forcing the POPULACE to DEPEND ON THE GOVERNMENT FOR ITS SUSTENANCE, and, at once, INHIBITING OPEN REBELLION AGAINST TYRANNY.

There is too much evidence to support this inference, for anyone to rationally deny it. And from what I gather from his book, “Justice For All,” and from his podcasts, “Greg Kelly Reports,” on Newsmax, Kelly appears to acknowledge this as well.

Through the dismantling of the Nation’s institutions, and eradication of the TENETS, PRECEPTS, and PRINCIPLES of INDIVIDUALISM, UPON WHICH OUR CONSTITUION IS GROUNDED, the RADICAL LEFT intends to bring about a massively transformed, multicultural society, grounded on the TENETS, PRECEPTS, and PRINCIPLES of COLLECTIVISM.

A Dystopian vision for America, and, by extension, for Western Civilization, is modeled on TOTALITARIAN COLLECTIVISM, existent in CCP China.

NEO-MARXIST CULTIST ACADEMICIANS PROVIDE A FICTIONAL PSEUDO-HISTORY that serves as both the blueprint for and the rationale for DISMANTLING a FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND A FREE AND SOVEREIGN PEOPLE.

NEO-MARXIST CULTIST AGITATORS AND PROVOCATEURS CARRY OUT “THE DIRTY WORK.”

AND THE NEO-MARXIST CULTIST NEWSPAPERS, PERIODICALS, SOCIAL MEDIA, CABLE AND BROADCAST NEWS ORGANIZATIONS, AND INTERNET PODCASTS AND WEBSITES, AND PUBLISHING HOUSES OPERATE AS THE DELIVERY VEHICLES FOR DISSEMINATING NEO-MARXIST PROPAGANDA, They serve as THE BULLHORN and ECHO CHAMBER for the COLLECTIVIST agenda, ushering in the ruination and devastation of all that Americans cherish and treasure.

The target group is the American people at large. The DOGMA, NARRATIVES, and SIMPLISTIC PRETENTIOUS MESSAGING are collected, packaged, and delivered to the public and then, like a bomb, exploded in the public’s midst.

The aim is to confuse, confound, and demoralize Americans—inducing mass hysteria and psychosis, massaging the psyche of the populace, and softening the public up—so that it cannot effectively organize a resistance against this MARXIST COUNTERREVOLUTION.

The major NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST GROUPS, BLACK LIVES MATTER (“BLM”) AND ANTIFA operate with the TWO other NEO-MARXIST ELEMENTS. AS AGENTS OF TERROR, BLM and ANTIFA CREATE IMMEDIATE FEAR AND ANXIETY AMONG THE PUBLIC.

Kelly spends considerable time discussing the NEO-MARXIST “BLACK LIVES MATTER” (“BLM”) movement and touches upon ANTIFA.

Both have INTERNATIONALIST roots. BOTH are criminal terrorist outfits. Their members are thugs.

The two invariably make their appearance at and are often instrumental in organizing VIOLENT PROTESTS.

As AGENT PROVOCATEURS, THEY ENCOURAGE THE MANY LEMMINGS WHO APPEAR AT THE PROTESTS TO ENGAGE IN ACTS OF VIOLENCE, ALONG WITH THEM, WHEN THEY MIGHT OTHERWISE AVOID TAKING PART IN ACTUAL VIOLENT ACTS THAT GO FAR BEYOND ANYTHING THAT CAN EVEN ARGUABLY BE INFERRED TO BE MERELY INNOCENT ACTS OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

It is no accident that these agitators’ crimes go unpunished.

Indeed, the NEO-MARXISTS and NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST RADICAL LEFT PERSONAGES in both FEDERAL and STATE Governments and in the PRESS provide cover for these terrorists as they foment unrest and violence against innocent Americans and small business owners.

THESE INTERNATIONALIST TERROR GROUPS OPERATE AS DE FACTO SEDITIOUS AND REBELLIOUS “INSURGENT” MILITARY ARMS OF THE POLITICAL PROGRESSIVE (NEO-MARXIST) ELEMENTS IN STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.E

THE RADICAL LEFT JOE BIDEN (THE GREAT “UNIFIER”—AND SO HE LIED) AND HIS ADMINISTRATION HAVE DELIBERATELY PLAYED ONE GROUP OF AMERICANS OFF THE OTHER.

IT SERVED A FEW PURPOSES:

ONE, WEAKENING SOCIETY FROM WITHIN, THEREBY HASTENING SOCIAL DECAY, AND SOCIETAL COLLAPSE.

TWO, PREVENTING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC FROM ORGANIZING TENABLE RESISTANCE AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL TYRANNY, AND

THREE, DEFLECTING ATTENTION AWAY FROM A TYRANT GOVERNMENT, AND ONTO ONE-HALF OF THE CITIZENRY, CLAIMING/ARGUING THAT ONE   SEGMENT OF THE PUBLIC—THAT IS TO SAY—“RIGHT-WING DOMESTIC TERRORISTS” (TRUMP’S MAGA SUPPORTERS-CHRISTIAN NATIONALISTS) ARE THE SALIENT, IF NOT SOLE, SOURCE OF ALL THE NATION’S WOES.  

ALL THOSE AWFUL “WHITE RACE” OPPRESSORS——REALLY?

The Neo-Marxists lump MEMBERS of the “WHITE RACE” into the domain of the MASTER RACE — ”COLONIALIST OPPRESSORS.“

Never mind that most “WHITES” would hardly think of themselves as OPPRESSORS toward anyone as they struggle to eke out a living and cause and desire no enmity toward anyone. NOR should they. NOR should they think ill of themselves or anyone else. And they do not.

Most are struggling like anyone else regardless of RACE.

Most Americans struggle to make ends meet.

Yet, WHITES are expected now to pay REPARATIONS TO BLACKS. REPARATIONS EQUAL RANSOM. AND WHO ARE THESE BLACKS OR “COLORED” TO WHOM WHITES MUST PAY THIS RANSOM?

AND, WHY SHOULD WHITES WHOSE ANCESTORS NEVER LIVED IN THE ANTEBELLUM SOUTH AND OF THE MANY WHO NEVER ARRIVED IN AMERICA UNTIL DECADES AFTER THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR ENDED AND WHO NEVER EVEN SAW A “BLACK” (“COLORED”) PERSON BEFORE SHOULD NONETHELESS BE PERCEIVED AS MORALLY CULPABLE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS IDEA OF “REPRESSION OF THE BLACK (“COLORED”) RACE NONETHESS?

IS NOT THE ENTIRE NEO-MARXIST ENTERPRISE PREDICATED ON HOKUM, DESIGNED TO FURTHER CREATE A SCHISM AMONG THE HOI POLLOI IN AMERICA, REGARDLESS OF “RACE” TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM REFLECTING ON THE HORROR OF WHAT NEO-MARXISTS HAVE IN STORE FOR ALL AMERICANS?

DOES NOT THIS NEO-MARXIST ENTERPRISE ATTEMPT TO CREATE ENMITY AMONG AMERICANS WHERE NONE EXISTS NOR SHOULD EXIST?

The RADICAL LEFT deliberately, systematically subverts the Nation and its people, its institutions, and its Constitution, in furtherance of an agenda directed at unraveling all of society. To that end, THE RADICAL LEFT insists ALL BLACKS are needlessly, senselessly OPPRESSED and that all “WHITES” are hopelessly, and passionately (or dispassionately) and diabolically predisposed to OPPRESS BLACKS.

AND——

Never mind that more than a few “BLACKS” have done very well for themselves,  becoming millionaires (a few even becoming billionaires) in THIS SEEMINGLY PERVERSE, RACIST SOCIETY. YET, ASK YOURSELF:

BUT, THEN, how is it that such a SEEMINGLY BRUTAL SOCIETY (NOW AND AT ITS INCEPTION) WOULD PERMIT BLACK (AND COLORED) PEOPLE TO SUCCEED on their merit, like ANY “WHITE” PERSON if THIS SOCIETY were HELPLESSLY, HOPELESSLY, ENDLESSLY CORRUPT?

Why would so many desire to come to America (MANY MILLIONS ILLEGALLY) if this Country were such an undesirable place to reside in?

NEO-MARXISTS don’t have an answer for any of this and deliberately skirt the question as these questions only weaken their CAREFULLY CONSTRUCTED MYTH.

THE BOTTOM LINE——

The facts serve to refute a basic NEO-MARXIST axiom and shibboleth from which everything—THEIR AGENDA, OBJECTIVES, TACTICS—proceed:

THE IDEA OF A “WHITE OPPRESSOR CLASS” (BRUTAL MASTER RACE (“HERRENMENSCH”)) USING THE “BLACK” OPPRESSED (UNDERDOG, ENSLAVED RACE (“UNTERMENSCH”)) TO SERVE THE WHITE OPPRESSOR RACE’S EVERY WANT AND NEED, AND THE BLACK OPPRESSED RACE REAPING NO REWARD FROM THEIR LABOR.

To call this a gross simplistic overgeneralization is to give more credit to it than it deserves.

It is an outright lie, and yet the Federal Government under the Biden Administration and many of the States give credence to this absurdity, playing it as a TRUISM of our AMERICAN HISTORY. The Government plays along with the myth of an America that bespeaks a reality in America as prevalent today as in the past.

Karl Marx would likely perceive the NEO-MARXIST BASTARDIZATION of his FLAWED VIEW OF ECONOMIC REALITY as a BLATANT ABSURDITY, COMPOUNDING THE INHERENT ABSURDITY OF MARXISM, WHETHER “CLASSICAL” MARXISM OR THIS NEW WAVE RACIALIST, ESSENTIALIST, MARXISM, UPROOTING PROSPEROUS FREE MARKET CAPITALISM AND UPROOTING ALL OF OUR NATION’S PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS.

That the Federal Government (the BIDEN ADMINISTRATION and much of the CONGRESS, and a few MEMBERS OF THE HIGH COURT) would be a party to this TRAVESTY—THAT SEEKS THE UNDOING OF OUR NATION—that actively, avidly, exuberantly trumpets a FAIRY TALE to undermine a Nation’s prosperity and security and all of it MANUFACTURED and IMPLEMENTED for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of accomplishing that end, bespeaks a treachery graver and more grotesque than anything this Country has faced at any other time in its history.

As with all CONFUSED, DISJOINTED, AND INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT BELIEF SYSTEMS, the NEO-MARXIST RADICAL LEFT MUST CONSTANTLY READJUST, RECALLIBRATE ITS DOGMA, IDEOLOGY, AND RUNNING NARRATIVES TO COHERE TO CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES.

The Neo-Marxists have modified their narrative as exigency demands as events evolve. They do this to maintain a modicum of coherence.

As the application of THE MYTH THEY CONCOCTED becomes more expansive—with no part of the Country and no institution untouched BY IT—the incoherence OF IT becomes glaring.

The NEO-MARXIST ACADEMICIANS must incessantly make changes TO IT, to keep the BELIEF SYSTEM FROM COLLAPSING IN ON ITSELF.

It is the Nation that the NEO-MARXISTS seek to destroy through the APPLICATION OF THIS COLLECTIVIST BELIEF SYSTEM, buttressed by ridiculous mythology, that the NEO-MARXISTS must prevent the public from gaining awareness of INHERENT FLAWS WITHIN THAT SYSTEM, lest the public rebel against it.

The NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS THEREFORE ASSIDUOUSLY CONTROL PUBLIC COGNITION TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM PERCEIVING THE INHERENT FLAWS WITHIN THEIR BELIEF SYSTEM.

Many Americans ARE, nonetheless, rebelling against this LUDICROUS NEO-MARXIST BELIEF SYSTEM—POINTING OUT THE INHERENT INCONGRUITY OF IT ALONG WITH THE DESTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL ATTENDANT TO IT, WHICH OF COURSE, IS THE SALIENT PURPOSE OF IT.

ALL THOSE POOR OPPRESSED BLACKS——REALLY?

In keeping with the need to revamp the NEO-MARXIST BELIEF SYSTEM under exigent circumstances——

The BLACK OPPRESSED UNDERDOGS now include a heterogeneous assortment of so-called “COLORED” PEOPLE (i.e., “PEOPLE OF COLOR”). The latter phrase is not only the preferred vernacular but the required argot. THE NEO-MARXISTS demand strict adherence to phraseology as they happen to dictate it to the public.

One Dare Not Say, “COLORED PEOPLE,” else one be called down for it. A person must use the phrase ‘BLACK or BROWN PEOPLE’ or ‘PEOPLE OF COLOR’ when mentioning the “OPPRESSED CLASS.”

This NEW WAVE CULTURAL, RACIALIST, ESSENTIALIST POST-MODERN MARXIST considers certain phraseology as inflammatory and insulting even as they wish to lump many NON-BLACKS into a “COLORED” (“BLACK” and “BROWN”) category.

BUT CREATING AN ENTIRE FAIRY TALE ABOUT “RACE” SERVES TO RESURRECT OLD MYTHS AND POINTS TO THE DISJOINTEDNESS AND INCONGRUITY OF THE NEO-MARXISTS’ BELIEF SYSTEM ON THIS MATTER ALONE, FOR THEY ACTIVELY PROMOTE THE INFERIORITY OF THE “COLORED” RACE AND THEN AT ONCE, ODDLY AND ABSURDLY BUT VERY, VERY SUBTLY AND TACITLY DECLARE:

OF COURSE THE BLACK AND BROWN RACE IS INFERIOR AND THAT IS WHY WE MUST DEMAND ‘EQUALITY OF OUTCOMES’ FOR, OTHERWISE, THIS RACE CANNOT COMPETE ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD WITH THE SUPERIOR, OPPRESSOR WHITE RACE.’”

DOES THE BLACK AND BROWN RACE REALLY WANT TO HEAR THIS? OF COURSE NOT.

BUT, THAT IDEA UNDERSCORES THE NOTION OF THE NEO-MARXIST REVAMPING OF THE IDEA INHERENT IN OUR COUNTRY OF THE IMPORTANCE OF “EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY” AMONG ALL PEOPLE.

INSTEAD, THEY SUBSTITUTE THIS IDEA WITH THE NOTION OF “EQUALITY OF OUTCOME” (“EQUITY”)—AND ONE DESTRUCTIVE TO THE SANCTITY OF THE COMMON MAN AS “INDIVIDUAL.”

THIS DESIRE FOR “EQUALITY OF OUTCOME” IS CONCOMITANT WITH THE IDEA OF A BLACK AND BROWN “RACE” AS ONE NOT ONLY OPPRESSED BY THE “WHITE RACE” BUT ONE MARKEDLY INFERIOR TO THE “WHITE RACE.”

AND THIS RAISES A THORNY QUESTION——

IS A NOTION OF “RACE” EVEN TENABLE?

These FANATIC NEO-MARXIST CULTISTS insist on emphasizing “RACE” and the FAIRY TALE they constructed from whole cloth about RACE—A NATURAL TENSION EXISTENT between “WHITES” AND “BLACKS”—lest THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTED FAIRY TALE EDIFICE COLLAPSE.

But it is through adherence to their manufactured FAIRY TALE that a distinction must be drawn between this NEW School brand of MARXISM and the OLD School brand of MARXISM developed by KARL MARX because the LATTER SCHOOL does not posit any assumption about RACE—BUT ONLY ECONOMIC CLASS:

CAPITALISM AS A DISTINCT ECONOMIC CLASS AND EVER AT ODDS WITH LABOR, AS A DISTINCT ECONOMIC CLASS.

The distinction between the OLD and NEW SCHOOLS OF MARXISM is crucial and it is a major sticking point for NEO-MARXISTS.

CLASSICAL MARXISM is at LOGGERHEADS with THIS NEW BREED OF MARXISM, grounded principally on the notion of RACE POLITICS. See, e.g., the article in Themelios for one perspective on this.

These new wave NEO-MARXISTS bear some similarity to the CLASSICAL MARXISTS only insofar as the new school has evolved from a common belief in an antagonistic relationship between those who PRODUCE GOODS and services—LABOR—and those who reap the ultimate benefit from that labor, the OWNERS of MARKET PRODUCTION, that is to say, the CAPITALISTS. THIS, IN ESSENCE, IS THE MAIN THRUST OF CLASSICAL MARXISM.

But, as the CULTURAL MARXISTS connote labor exclusively with SLAVE LABOR, TIED TO RACE, this NEW BRAND of MARXISM has evolved (OR DEVOLVED) into an entirely new species of economic, political, and social thought—a new academic discipline taking over education: From GRADE SCHOOL and HIGH SCHOOL through UNIVERSITY and POST-GRADUATE LEVEL EDUCATION.

And this BIZARRE THOUGHT has permeated not only through the “SOFT SCIENCES” and through the “LIBERAL ARTS CURRICULA” but through the “HARD SCIENCES”—“STEM”—and has infected the professions, such as law and medicine, as well.

But as for introducing and injecting “RACE” into his theories, Marx would himself puzzle over the need FOR IT and would immediately see the incoherence OF IT precisely because the DISTINCTION BETWEEN LABOR AND CAPITAL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A NOTION OF RACE.

For Karl Marx, both BLACKS (“PEOPLE OF COLOR”) and WHITES illustrate membership in one or the other CLASSIFICATION—CAPITAL or LABOR IRRESPECTIVE OF RACE.

CLASSICAL MARXISM therefore belies the notion that one’s “RACE” predominates or even factors into the calculation of classification.

The fact of wealthy “BLACK” CAPITALISTS in society serves to refute “RACE-BASED” MARXISM and tends to support CLASSICAL MARXISM.

That fact is, at least, internally consistent with CLASSICAL MARXISM, even though MARXISM is flawed as an economic theory.

BUT, RACIALIST, ESSENTIALIST, MULTICULTURAL MARXISM CANNOT EXPLAIN THE INCONSISTENCY, DEMONSTRATING IRREFUTABLY, THE INTERNAL INCOHERENCE AT THE HEART OF THIS RACIALIST, ESSENTIALIST, MODERN MARXISM (NEO-MARXISM).

SO, THEN, HOW DO THE NEO-MARXISTS DEAL WITH THE INHERENT CONTRADICTION IN THEIR BELIEF SYSTEM?

We see what the NEO-MARXISTS DO through the claims that these NEO-MARXIST BLACK MULTIMILLIONAIRES and BILLIONAIRES MAKE.

Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey, among others, SIMPLY IGNORE reference to their considerable monetary wealth and their popularity by claiming, disingenuously and lamely, that they are oppressed. HOW SO?

Because they are BLACK? But, IF SO, then how do the NEO-MARXISTS RECONCILE the claim of FABULOUS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY, ALONG WITH A LIFE OF EASE, WITH THE BALD-FACED AND DUBIOUS CLAIM THESE FABULOUSLY WEALTHY PEOPLE SUFFER EXTRAORDINARY DEPRIVATION SPRINGING FROM SOME SORT OF INHERENT “RACIAL POVERTY” GOING BACK TO THE ANTEBELLUM PERIOD AND BEFORE THAT? SIMPLE AND SIMPLISTIC DENIAL DOES NOT SUFFICE BUT BEGS THE QUESTION: “IS ONE’S SKIN COLOR THE DEFINING FACTOR OR, FOR THAT MATTER, A LEGITIMATE FACTOR AT ALL IN ASSESSING THE QUALITY OR QUANTITY OF ONE’S SUFFERING SUCH THAT AMERICAN SOCIETY, AS IT PRESENTLY EXISTS, MUST BE OBLITERATED?”

CONSIDER——

HOW WOULD ACQUISITION OF EXTRAORDINARY WEALTH BY SOME “BLACKS,” NO LESS THAN BY SOME “WHITES,” BE POSSIBLE IN AN AVOWEDLY RACIST SOCIETY?

THE ANSWER? SUCH A THING WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE. The NEO-MARXIST CANNOT make a cogent case. It is logically impossible.

And so, the NEO-MARXIST ignores the ECONOMIC REALITY, at the heart of all MARXIST THEORY of CAPITAL VERSUS LABOR, and simply remarks that Michelle Obama and Oprah Winfrey, and other BLACKS, IN THEIR ECONOMIC CLASS, suffer PRECISELY because they are BLACK, AND NOTWITHSTANDING THEIR FABULOUS WEALTH. BUT THAT WON’T DO!

That begs THE SALIENT QUESTION at issue, which the NEO-MARXIST CANNOT IGNORE. HOW have these “BLACKS” suffered? IF THEY INSIST THAT THEY HAVE SUFFERED AND CONTINUE TO SUFFER AT THE HANDS OF THE WHITE OPPRESSOR CLASS, LET THEM MAKE THEIR CASE TO ONE SUCH OSTENSIBLE MEMBER OF THAT MASTER RACE “OPPRESSOR (PRIVILEGED) CLASS”: THE WHITE COAL MINERS AND THEIR FAMILIES STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE IN APPALACHIA.

IS IT NOT DISCORDANT EVEN TO TALK ABOUT RACE IN THIS DAY AND AGE?  

More to the point, PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY “RACE” THEORY (“SCIENTIFIC RACISM”) is incompatible with modern work in Human Genetics.

SCIENTIFIC RACISM is slipshod, nebulous, or simply degenerate.

It all hearkens back to the writings of Mid-Nineteenth Century and Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Race Theorists such as Arthur de Gobineau, Madison Grant, Hans F. K. Günter, Lothrop Stoddard, and most recently, Carleton S. Coon.

“SCIENTIFIC RACISM” tied to EUGENICS is less hard science and more “ART FORM.”

It is one pointing to and emphasizing “PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES” among people as the salient and decisive factor in the discussion of differences among people.

The proponent of this ART FORM extrapolates from one’s PHYSICAL APPEARANCE to false and peculiar ideas about a person’s intelligence and his or her psychological traits, and characteristics, and proclivities and even to matters of aesthetics (“physical beauty”).

The internet is replete with this as posited on sites such as stormfront.org (a virulent purveyor of hatred and contempt for “BLACKS,” “COLORED PEOPLE,” and some “WHITES,” notably JEWS).

BUT, THEN, IS NOT THE NEO-MARXISTS’ CONTEMPT AND HATRED OF “WHITES” (“ARYANS”) AND JEWS (“NON-ARYANS”) ANY DIFFERENT?

Then there are seemingly benign websites discussing at length phenotypical differences among people, dividing “RACES” into categories based solely on physical appearance (primarily facial) and one’s bearing.

A favorite activity of proponents of “SCIENTIFIC RACISM” involves further subdividing members of the “WHITE” RACE into a substantial number of SUBCATEGORIES, such as “NORDIC,” “ALPINE,” “DINARIC,” and “HITHER ASIATIC” to name a few, and further dividing the “WHITE” RACE into SUB-SUBCATEGORIES, as, for example, dividing the NORDIC RACE into SUB-SUBCATEGORIES such as Borreby, Trønder, Brünn, Fälish, Hallstat.

Sites that play around with this include Christogenea, Anthroworld Forum, Racial Compact, and the Apricity Forum.

I would be remiss for failure to note the NEO-MARXIST RACIALISTS, who go on about all these OPPRESSED “COLORED PEOPLE” (“PEOPLE OF COLOR”), include among the OPPRESSED “COLORED,” people of Indian descent, Arabs, Iranians, Native Americans, and a large amorphous group of people lumped into the CATEGORY of “HISPANICS.”

Not surprisingly, and quite understandably, many of these so-called “HISPANICS” loathe such ridiculous neologisms constructed by NEO-MARXISTS, such as ‘LATINO,’ and ‘LATINX’ to describe a large, diverse group of human beings.

The curious thing is that these “COLORED PEOPLE” are, historically, not “COLORED” at all. Those who espouse “SCIENTIFIC RACISM” properly place these people into the domain of “WHITE RACE”.

Yet, the NEO-MARXIST misapprehends this, erroneously lumping these members OF THE WHITE RACE in with “COLORED PEOPLE” or, if you will, “PEOPLE OF COLOR” or, in THIS OR THAT group of “BROWN and “BLACK PEOPLE.”

But, if one truly wishes to abide by the original nomenclature, then why not accept the old simple three categories of “BLACK RACE” (“NEGROID”), “WHITE RACE” (“CAUCASIAN”), and “YELLOW RACE” (“MONGOLOID”) and leave the matter at that?

Hence—“BLACK,” “WHITE,” AND “YELLOW.” Simple, even if hardly useful, an old biological makeweight, and there we have it.

Old ideas die hard, but the NEO-MARXISTS toy with this as well, to make up a fiction of their own as they go along, and it is all designed to tear our society apart, caring not one whit for the worth and dignity of individuals but only concerned about manipulation of groups to which they lump this or that person.

This is a major tenet of COLLECTIVISM”—antithetical to and impossible to mediate with “INDIVIDUALISM” upon which our Nation was built and upon which it prospered and upon which the strength of our Nation, its BILL OF RIGHTS, is firmly entrenched.

But the NEO-MARXISTS need a “RACIAL” classification to make COLLECTIVISM come to fruition.

It is the modus operandi upon which they operate to undermine the entire structure of our Society, grounded on INDIVIDUALISM, which does not adhere to or utilize RACIAL CLASSIFICATION as a tenet.

RACIAL CLASSIFICATIONS are inconsistent with the notion of the sanctity and inviolability of the individual.

But the Radical Left dismisses this idea out of hand because it weakens the carefully constructed fiction they have methodically developed and thrust on the public.

But, even with RACIAL CLASSIFICATIONS and their need to create preferences, they must tinker around the edges. This demonstrates the ad hoc nature of the entire enterprise.

For example, they deny categorizing “Asians” as “PEOPLE OF COLOR,” for preferential treatment, likely because, as a group, Asians have done very well for themselves, in a society that historically and to its great success and credit promotes the idea of EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY— recognizing success grounded on one’s merit, motivation, and ambition. Imagine that! NEO-MARXISTS WON’T SUFFER THAT!

So Asians are treated by the RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS as DE FACTO members of the WHITE “OPPRESSOR” RACE. This only serves to illustrate and emphasize the incoherence of, inconsistency of, and crass idiocy of the entire edifice the RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS have constructed to push their agenda, as Asians have suffered prejudice no less so than “BLACKS,” and, in these modern times, arguably more so than “BLACKS.”

If truth be known, every “group,” including “WHITES” of different national origin has suffered prejudice at some point in their past, and many still do, especially Jews. But, Americans have done much, evolving beyond this. People hold onto their culture and beliefs when they come into our Country (LAWFULLY) and become CITIZENS, and that is a good thing. But, from whatever Country they emigrate from, these naturalized citizens and their offspring ASSIMILATE—that is to say, they inculcate an AMERICAN IDENTITY.

BUT THIS IDEA, TOO, “ASSIMILATION,” THE NEO-MARXISTS OBJECT TO ADAMANTLY AND HAVE EMPLOYED MEANS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES TO DESTROY THE CONCEPT OF “ASSIMILATION.” IT DOESN’T FIT INTO THEIR SOCIO-POLITICAL PARADIGM.

Why bring prejudice back to the surface and make it THE MAINSTAY of a BELIEF SYSTEM that only serves to create enmity among people? Is THE AIM truly to help “BLACKS” and other “PEOPLE OF COLOR” or do the NEO-MARXISTS treat “BLACKS” less as VICTIM and more as TOOL TO ASSIST IN THE RUIN OF AMERICA AND, BY EXTENSION, IN THE RUIN OF ALL OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION?

A reasonable person would think that, if the NEO-MARXISTS ARE DEAD-SET ON TRANSFORMING SOCIETY, THEN A RADICAL REWORKING OF SOCIETY WOULD REFLECT REALITY AS IT EXISTS, AND NOT AS THE LEFT MIGHT PREFER IT TO BE. But this is not the case at all. IT IS NOT WHAT THEY WANT. IT IS NOT WHAT THEY ARE AFTER.

THEY INTEND TO MOLD AND SHAPE PERCEPTION TO CREATE A FALSE REALITY THAT COHERES—TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE FOR A SYSTEM THAT IS INHERENTLY INCOHERENT AND INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT—WITH THEIR FEVER DREAM OF A WELL-ORDERED WELL-ENGINEERED SOCIETY REMINISCENT OF AN ANT COLONY OR A BEEHIVE, WHICH MEETS THEIR GOAL OF MAXIMIZING UTILITY, PROMOTING THEIR BIZARRE NOTION OF “THE GOOD.”

The RADICAL LEFT’S constant construction of neologisms and constant tinkering with their own narratives to force Reality to cohere and conform to those narratives, as events constantly dictate the reformulation of their fictions, illustrate the bankrupt nature of and logical fallacies inherent in their entire fictional fantasy world construct.

CONSIDER——

HOW HAS THIS ALL COME TO BE AND HOW IS IT THAT THE RADICAL LEFT, THE NEO-MARXIST CONTINGENT OF THE RADICAL LEFT, AND THE OTHER COMPONENTS OF IT CONTINUE TO GAIN INFLUENCE AND EXERT MORE AND MORE CONTROL OVER THE COUNTRY, AND OVER THE COUNTRY’S INSTITUTIONS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?

But, for a massive infusion of monies into their absurd programs and campaigns, and the power of and the sheer EXTANT of forces at work to undermine the SECURITY of a FREE STATE, to undercut the AMERICAN REVOLUTION of 1776, and bring about the dissolution of the U.S. as an independent sovereign Nation and a FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC—where the American people are themselves sovereign over Government—the RADICAL LEFT movement would never have gotten off the ground.

That the Radical Left HAS GOTTEN OFF THE GROUND and not only survived but flourished and that its intended aim—as is plain from the effects on the Country and the American people—is DESTRUCTIVE, NOT CONSTRUCTIVE in nature, and is designed to REPLACE a powerful, prosperous Country with a weakened impoverished one, should give all Americans pause.

The citizenry must not fall prey to the dangerous myths perpetrated on it, for this can lead to and is leading to its ruin and its demise as a people and as a Nation.

Americans have a chance—THEIR LAST ONE —to force the RADICAL LEFT’s hand before it is too late.

Voting Donald Trump back into Office will do just that.

Despite all the efforts to hamper Trump’s ability to govern the Country during his Presidency, he showed that America could recover its strength, resilience, and stability, and his policies and initiatives were intended to do just that and they did just that.

But the RADICAL LEFT WANTS NONE OF THAT and they intend to pull out all the stops to prevent Donald Trump’s reelection.

The RADICAL LEFT LEADERSHIP saw what was happening. Donald Trump had awakened the public to the omnipresent danger posed by the RADICAL LEFT, and they would not abide that, as it defeated all their plans to bring about the ruin of the Nation, enabling the remains to be merged into a world empire over which they would rule unimpeded by nation-states, especially the United States that was born in fire and flame and would itself not abide TYRANNY.

Since orchestrating his loss in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, the RADICAL LEFT has, THROUGH ITS POWERFUL CONTROL OVER THE VAST MACHINERY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE PRESS AND EXERTING SUBSTANTIAL CONTROL OVER THE STATES, IT HAD ONCE AGAIN REGAINED THE INITIATIVE AND DEMONSTRATED ITS ABILITY TO HYPNOTIZE A BROAD SWATH OF THE PUBLIC.

With Trump well positioned to secure the Republican Party nomination for U.S. President in 2024, and with over one-half of the population prepared to vote him back into Office having had its fill of both the Biden Administration and a Congress either terrible or effete, and realizing that the attempt to induce a nonsensical rabid hatred of Trump through an intensive campaign of psychological conditioning made possible through their control of the Press and Social Media does not cloak an agenda designed to enervate the Country and dismantle the Nation’s institutions, the RADICAL LEFT LEADERSHIP HAS RESORTED TO MORE EXTREME MEASURES TO PREVENT TRUMP FROM SECURING THE 2024 U.S. PRESIDENCY. THE LEADERSHIP HAS ENGAGED IN UNETHICAL AND OUTRIGHT UNLAWFUL USE OF THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM IN TO DESTROY TRUMP’S PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION AND BRING ABOUT HIS FINANCIAL RUIN.

Yet, the ridiculous criminal and civil charges lodged against Trump demonstrate not the power of the RADICAL LEFT, but, rather, its inherent weakness (considering the lengths it has gone to destroy the man, beyond all rational understanding).

The RADICAL LEFT has illustrated for the Electorate to see, its frantic fear of Trump, and its enduring, deep-seated suspicion of the American people.

The RADICAL LEFT has pushed to keep the American citizenry in a state of weariness, malaise, and flux. It has pushed the citizenry to the limits of its ability to tolerate ineptitude and deceit, and the public should resist any further attempts to placate it.

This is not the time for Americans to surrender to these forces of evil.

It is time for Americans, the COMMON MAN, to get to work to preserve a Free Republic that the Founders gave us through their courage and sacrifice, and that Americans have worked hard to protect ever since through their courage and sacrifice.

THE GOAL: SAFEGUARDING OUR FREE REPUBLIC AND MAINTAINING OUR SOVEREIGNTY OVER GOVERNMENT.

WHAT COULD BE WRONG WITH THAT?

THE RADICAL LEFT NEVER EXPLAINS. BUT, THEN, THERE IS NOTHING THAT IT CAN EXPLAIN.

Greg Kelly provides clear evidence of the RADICAL LEFT’s GAMEPLAN and explains who they are and what their STRATEGIES are to bring about the ruin of the Country.

I provide context for Kelly’s observations as I analyze his work Chapter by Chapter, and I begin that task forthwith with SUBPART B OF PART THREE of this ESSAY.

______________________

 

Previous
Previous

STATE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAII BLATANTLY DEFIES SECOND AMENDMENT AND U.S. SUPREME COURT RULINGS: “ALOHA ‘OE”

Next
Next

A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF GREG KELLY’S “JUSTICE FOR ALL”: REMARKS ON THE “INTRODUCTION” TO KELLY’S BOOK IN THE CONTEXT OF, AND ILLUMINATING THE THREAT POSED TO, THE NATION BY THE “RADICAL LEFT”