THE NEW YORK ANTONYUK CASE: “BRUEN II” IN THE MAKING?
POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE THE NEW YORK ANTONYUK CASE: “BRUEN II” IN THE MAKING? dry on Bruen when New York Governor Kathy Hochul, commanded the State Legislature to place the . Bruen, 2202 Lexis 15784 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2022).It is important to keep this case in mind, for the bruen U.S. Supreme Court will deal with it. It will become Bruen II.The TRO suspends the operation of the Government's defiance toward the U.S. Supreme Court's Bruen rulings—no less so than for its
OVERCOMING BRUEN TO SAVE THE SULLIVAN ACT: NEW YORK GOVERNOR HOCHUL’S GAMBIT
POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE “Proper Cause” down. New York State Rifle and Pistol Association vs. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. at 2155. The OVERCOMING BRUEN TO SAVE THE SULLIVAN ACT: NEW YORK GOVERNOR HOCHUL’S GAMBIT State Rifle and Pistol Association vs. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111, 2155 (2022), the New York Government to in 110 years since the enactment of Sullivan. But, then Bruen came along. Many Anti-Second the Sullivan Act. Justice Thomas, writing for the Majority in Bruen, offers by way of explanation
NEW YORK CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY SINCE BRUEN: A STEP FORWARD OR A STEP BACKWARD?
NEW YORK CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY SINCE BRUEN: A STEP FORWARD OR A STEP BACKWARD? , the U.S. Supreme Court decided N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association vs. Bruen, 2022 U.S. LEXIS 3055 TO UNDERSTAND BRUEN, IT IS IMPERATIVE TO UNDERSTAND HELLER, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO the Bruen case makes clear that a person has the fundamental right of armed self-defense outside ; BRUEN DOESN’T REFORM OR REPLACE HELLER, IT BUILDS ON IT. THE IMPLICATIONS OF BRUEN On June 23, 2022 bruen POST BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR
NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL'S DEFIANCE OF THE SCOTUS BRUEN DECISION OPENS A NEW FRONT IN WAR AGAINST SECOND AMENDMENT
POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL'S DEFIANCE OF THE SCOTUS BRUEN DECISION OPENS A NEW FRONT IN WAR AGAINST SECOND AMENDMENT bruen constitution only acted in defiance of the Bruen rulings through the enactment of the CCIA but have consciously publication of the Bruen decision.Instead of complying with the Bruen rulings, Hochul and Albany and its decision in Bruen, on June 23, 2022. She made clear to New York residents, and no less to the Amendment case law decisions in Heller, McDonald and Bruen are on the line, and the American public can
NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL FILES APPEAL OF TRO: WHAT WILL THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT DO?
outright rapaciousness of the CCIA in the previous case, Antonyuk vs. Bruen when the Court dismissed the POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE  New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The law strengthens requirements for concealed consequentialism.The Heller, McDonald, and Bruen rulings upended the idea that the fundamental targeting New York gun owners.They once did, but no longer, certainly not since NYSRPA vs. Bruen.And bruen
THE LIBERAL WING OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OPERATES MORE AS AN ADVOCATE FOR GOVERNMENT POWER THAN AS A PROTECTOR OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
restricted as the Roberts’ Court made it, the Bruen case is unlikely to have an impact beyond the those involving the Bill of Rights.A decision in the Bruen case is expected in early Summer if not Heller.Likely the outcome of Bruen will be supportive of the Second Amendment, but it won’t be as far-reaching sooner. The Bruen case is the most important case on the Second Amendment since the Heller case of 2008 dissenting opinions in Heller, in a shameless attempt not only to denigrate Bruen, but to weaken bruen
BRUEN SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN NEEDED BUT WAS NEEDED BECAUSE COURTS REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH HELLER AND MCDONALD
purport of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as explained in Heller and McDonald. Bruen is FOUR As we alluded to, in our earlier articles on Bruen, the High Court’s decision is meant to redirect the actions of those jurisdictions that have misread and misapplied Heller.As one reads the Bruen heed Heller and McDonald is not acceptable. The Bruen decision as propounded is meant to correct BRUEN SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN NEEDED BUT WAS NEEDED BECAUSE COURTS REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH HELLER AND MCDONALD bruen POST BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR
THE SECOND AMENDMENT BRUEN CASE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE TO BE DECIDED THIS 2021-2022 TERM
POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE THE SECOND AMENDMENT BRUEN CASE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE TO BE DECIDED THIS 2021-2022 TERM BRUEN DECISION PART NINE PREFACE TO DEEP ANALYSIS OF NEW YORK’S RESPONSE TO BRUEN DECISION The TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE Bruen is the first major Second Amendment case decided by the High THEMSELVES AND THEIR DESCENDANTS MULTISERIES THE SECOND AMENDMENT BRUEN CASE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT bruen on the recent case NYSRPA vs. Bruen, for a few important reasons. FIRST: THE BRUEN RULINGS ARE VITAL
NEW YORK TIMES UNLEASHES ATTACK DOGS IN OP-ED ON EVE OF ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT IN BRUEN
The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral argument today on the  Second Amendment case NYSRPA vs. Bruen hearing in Bruen, J. Michael Luttig, a former U.S. Court of Appeals Judge, and Richard D. Bernstein NEW YORK TIMES UNLEASHES ATTACK DOGS IN OP-ED ON EVE OF ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT IN BRUEN bruen
NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL DOESN’T CARE WHAT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS ABOUT THE STATE'S HANDGUN LICENSING STATUTE
U.S. Supreme Court officially released its decision in the Bruen case. On that same date a Press Not content simply to say New York won’t comply with Bruen, the New York Governor’s response to Bruen. It reads as follows:“Good morning, everyone. We just received some very disturbing news from Bruen points to open revolt with the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Constitution.On June 23, 2022, the post-bruen bruen POST BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR
NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL DEFIES U.S. SUPREME COURT AND BRUEN RULINGS; INTENDS TO WEAKEN EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO ARMED SELF-DEFENSE
present Bruen case did just that. This case challenged the core of the Sullivan Act: the idea of armed case, NYSRPA vs. Bruen. The Hearing was a mere formality. Both parties, Plaintiff Petitioners, and Bruen resolve it. It is a man-made problem, arising from a man-made act—— Government licensing of case was NYSRPA vs. Bruen. With Justice Amy Coney Barrett now on the Bench, the Conservative wing of NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL DEFIES U.S. SUPREME COURT AND BRUEN RULINGS; INTENDS TO WEAKEN EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO ARMED SELF-DEFENSE about and tired of, forcing Cuomo to resign, knew that Bruen posed the greatest risk to the Sullivan Act
WHAT EXPLAINS NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL’S HOSTILITY TOWARD THE BRUEN DECISION ON CONCEALED
THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION To say the Bruen rulings directed primarily to New amendments well in advance of the publication of the Bruen decision, given the breadth of detail in to armed self-defense. WHAT EXPLAINS NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL’S HOSTILITY TOWARD THE BRUEN MULTIPART ESSAY SERIES ON POST-BRUEN CASE ANALYSIS POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT bruen WHAT EXPLAINS NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL’S HOSTILITY TOWARD THE BRUEN DECISION ON CONCEALED Court decision in N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022)and conceivably in
UNDER THE PRETEXT OF KEEPING THE RESIDENTS OF HER STATE SAFE, NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL DEFIES U.S. SUPREME COURT BRUEN RULINGS
the U.S. Supreme Court’s rulings in Bruen and thus avoid the categorical dictates of the Second MULTIPART SERIES ON POST-BRUEN CASE ANALYSIS POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS unconscionably harsh words for the High Court, calling the Bruen decision “reckless and reprehensible pending before the Court.”Kavanaugh’s point came to fruition with Bruen, two years later, and in a major post-bruen UNDER THE PRETEXT OF KEEPING THE RESIDENTS OF HER STATE SAFE, NEW YORK GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL DEFIES U.S. SUPREME COURT BRUEN RULINGS New York case gave her predecessor, Governor Andrew Cuomo, a trifling headache, the Bruen case gave bruen
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DESERVES ACCOLADES FOR THE BRUEN DECISION, BUT NEW YORK’S CHANGES TO ITS
POST-BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS AND WHAT ITS IMPACT IS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT AND CHERISH THE attempting to secure an unrestricted handgun carry license. These Post-Bruen Amendments merely substitute response to the Bruen rulings that is a sham, a dissembling, a pretense at satisfying the dictates of the post-bruen people who had hoped to obtain an unrestricted handgun carry license easily, Post-Bruen, now realizing THE U.S. SUPREME COURT DESERVES ACCOLADES FOR THE BRUEN DECISION, BUT NEW YORK’S CHANGES TO ITS bruen obediently complied with, the Court’s Bruen rulings, thereby vitiating the import of Bruen, and violating
NEW YORK’S GOVERNOR HOCHUL REFUSES TO ACCEPT THE BRUEN DECISION — “IT’S LIKE DÉJÀ VU ALL OVER AGAIN,” IN THE IMMORTAL WORDS OF YOGI BERRA
NEW YORK’S GOVERNOR HOCHUL REFUSES TO ACCEPT THE BRUEN DECISION — “IT’S LIKE DÉJÀ VU ALL OVER AGAIN,” IN THE IMMORTAL WORDS OF YOGI BERRA appearance in Bruen and such is the profound frustration apparent in the Majority Opinion. By using Part One of Justice Alito’s Concurring Opinion in BruenThere are two key components of Bruen. One that was the central topic of concern at oral argument in Bruen. And Bruen impacts other jurisdictions Bruen struck down the foundation of the New York's concealed handgun carry license regime—the bruen POST BRUEN—WHAT IT ALL MEANS BOTH FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR
SCOTUS, STOP THE MERRY-GO-ROUND ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT ANTONYUK CASE IMPACTING BRUEN, GRANT THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI, AND EXPEDITE REVIEW ON THE MERITS
enacted immediately after the Bruen decision came down. The New York Government appealed the District , captioned Antonyuk vs. Bruen, referred to as Antonyuk I (an abbreviation that serves as a useful the State’s Handgun Law following the publication of Bruen on June 23, 2022. In the first case SCOTUS, STOP THE MERRY-GO-ROUND ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT ANTONYUK CASE IMPACTING BRUEN, GRANT THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI, AND EXPEDITE REVIEW ON THE MERITS New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022)? We had our doubts but now have "THE FATE OF THE HIGH COURT'S DECISIONS IN HELLER, MCDONALD AND BRUEN AND THE FATE OF THE SECOND
INCONSISTENT WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE BRUEN RULINGS BUT ALSO INCOMPATIBLE WITH ITS OWN STATE STATUTES
Bruen, the Court wrote: ‘We therefore turn to whether the plain text of the Second Amendment protects INCONSISTENT WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE BRUEN RULINGS BUT ALSO INCOMPATIBLE WITH ITS OWN STATE STATUTES out the legal framework supporting the TRO: Bruen states that the appropriate test for applying the . Therefore, Plaintiffs’ burden under step one of the Bruen analysis is easily met for the same reason it , 2023, just one day after the Governor signed the Order. Citing Bruen, the Plaintiff Challenger laid certainly be challenged on Constitutional grounds. The move seems to run afoul of the Bruen Decision
MOST IMPORTANT SECOND AMENDMENT CASES TO COME BEFORE IT SINCE BRUEN: SNOPE AND ANTONYUK?
just two Associate Justices, namely, Clarence Thomas (author of the Bruen decision) and Samuel , Clarence Thomas (author of the Bruen decision) and Samuel Alito (author of the McDonald decision MOST IMPORTANT SECOND AMENDMENT CASES TO COME BEFORE IT SINCE BRUEN: SNOPE AND ANTONYUK? , McDonald, and Bruen as they must be taken as inextricably tied together. If one falls, so do the with the Conservative wing in Heller, McDonald, and Bruen, Chief Justice Roberts could not to the Bruen rulings. If the U.S. Supreme Court fails to take up this case, it effectively
WHO IS SHERIFF RICHARD GIARDINO AND HOW IS HE DEALING WITH NEW YORK’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY LAW?
the High Court rulings in Bruen that reinforce the natural law right to armed self-defense.How does extensively on both the parent U.S. Supreme Court case, NYSRPA vs. Bruen, and on Post-Bruen New York cases . Steven Nigrelli replaces both the Governor and Kevin Bruen, as the principal named Party Defendant, the lip service to the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Bruen. The CCIA further constrains the average law bruen . Supreme Court decision in NYSRPA vs. Bruen.The Hochul Government fabricated the CCIA to defy and defeat
TO WHOM DOES THE COUNTRY BELONG: THE PEOPLE OR THE GOVERNMENT?
Right. The failure of many jurisdictions to heed the rulings of Heller explains why Bruen came along to take up Bruen.What Justice Scalia meant by the phrase, “gun rights were not unlimited” is this bruen
See more