A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF GREG KELLY’S “JUSTICE FOR ALL”: REMARKS ON THE “INTRODUCTION” TO KELLY’S BOOK IN THE CONTEXT OF, AND ILLUMINATING THE THREAT POSED TO, THE NATION BY THE “RADICAL LEFT”
A MULTIPART ESSAY, PREPARED BY STEPHEN L. D’ANDRILLI, PRESIDENT AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE ARBALEST GROUP, LLC., CREATOR OF THE ARBALEST QUARREL WEBSITE
PART TWO (UPDATED)
REMARKS ON THE “INTRODUCTION” TO KELLY’S BOOK IN THE CONTEXT OF, AND ILLUMINATING THE THREAT POSED TO, THE NATION BY THE “RADICAL LEFT”
Greg Kelly doesn’t hold back any punches in his book. He’s not afraid to tell it like it is.
In his “Introduction,” he asserts, “This is a book about justice in America and the consequences to our beautiful nation if it fails.”
He personalizes the discussion by saying, “I’m sick of listening to elected officials, media personalities, and radical advocates who lie through their teeth about the reality of crime, criminal justice, and law enforcement in this country.”
He declares openly and plainly,
I wrote this book to lay out the case against Barack Obama, his politics of division, and the Democratic Party, which he continues to lead behind the scenes. . . .
The mainstream media is now avowedly far to the Left. They all went along with the Democrat lies about Russia-gate and Trump, they pushed the treason narrative, they amplified leftist lies about the police, and they colluded to keep the American people in the dark about essential matters.
The “RADICAL LEFT,”* of which the mainstream media (“MSM”) is a major component, fails to consider or otherwise deliberately avoids acknowledging that police work is dangerous work but essential work.
The job of police officers is to keep their communities safe. And, in doing that job, the police put their life on the line. That is true today. It was true decades ago. This is certainly true of New York City.
He points to the 1970s as an example to drive home the point.
Kelly writes, “During this era, there were so many police funerals.”
The author has provided a photo album in the book to reinforce the memory of NYPD officers who were brutally murdered.
These photographs of individuals make personal what words alone cannot convey, bringing clarity to the horror of the murders.
Two of the officers were Gregory Foster and Rocco Laurie.
The two were cut down in the prime of their life. Members of a radical terrorist group, the “Black Liberation Army.”
One of the “cops” was black, and one was white.
Their killer didn’t differentiate between the two (apparently only seeing “blue”).
Kelly writes,
Gregory Foster was only twenty-two; his murder left behind a widow and two children. . . . Rocco Laurie was twenty-three. His wife, Adelaide, describes her husband as a ‘wound that will never heal.’ . . .
The picture of two young widows, one black, one white, united in their grief, was splashed all over the papers and expressed a key message:
the forces of chaos, disorder, and division may disguise themselves as a movement, of liberation, but their victims come from all walks of life. The idea of a ‘thin blue line’ that protects society from the depredations of the criminal element has a truth it, and that also means that law enforcement officers may have different-color skin, but they all bleed blue.
How ironic it is that Gregory Foster’s grandson, also named Gregory, is a police officer working in the same Ninth Precinct.
The Grandson wears “his Grandfather’s badge number.”
The photos of slain police officers have had an impact on me because I, too, was a young officer in my early 20s back in the 1970s, working in uniform patrol in Chinatown’s Fifth Precinct that borders the Ninth.
Upon request, I would later be assigned to the Ninth Precinct in the East Village, where Foster and Laurie were gunned down.
Coincidentally, I now live in the East Village, and I occasionally pass by the Ninth Precinct.
It is appropriate that a memorial plaque paying tribute to their service hangs on a wall at the Precinct.
Equally disturbing are the photos of two more recent assassinations of officers: Rafael Ramos, a Latino “cop,” and Wenjian Liu, whose ethnicity is Chinese.
They “were assassinated in 2014 by a black supremacist criminal who sought revenge for the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown.”
The “cop” killer, a recidivist criminal, Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley, was a member of a prison gang that called itself the “Black Guerrilla Family.”
He murdered the two officers, ostensibly as revenge for the deaths of Eric Garner on Staten Island, New York, and Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
Brinsley was never repentant. After he murdered the two officers, he sarcastically and callously asserted, “I’m putting Wings on Pigs today.”
Individual members of RADICAL LEFT criminal groups and the groups collectively bear responsibility for numerous attacks on and murders of many police officers.
There were many Radical Left criminal groups active in the Twentieth Century. Most are defunct. Others have taken their place.
But something is different between the Radical Left Groups operating in the Twentieth Century and those operating in the Twenty-First.
That difference is NOT one of PURPOSE.
The Radical Left organizations active today in America share the same socio-political philosophy as those in the past.
And the difference is NOT one of TACTICS.
They utilize the same violent criminal TACTICS to sow fear and dissension in society. Those TACTICS include vandalism, arson, and murder.
And the difference is NOT one of AIM.
The central AIM of these groups is the same as those of the past: Destruction of the United States as a Free Constitutional Republic.
What IS different about the Radical Left Collectivist Marxist-Anarchist groups of today and those active in the previous Century has NOTHING to do with their thought processes or tactics, aims, and actions. It has NOTHING to do with any of that. And has NOTHING to do with the organizational structure or framework of these—for example, centralized or decentralized—or with the nature of the constituency of, or composition of, these groups and their members.
RATHER, it has EVERYTHING to do with,
THE POLICIES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, and with
THE POLICIES OF MANY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, and with
THE MINDSET OF MANY INSTITUTIONS, and with
THE MINDSET OF MANY AMERICANS.
Societal Institutions, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, have become suffused with noxious dogmas and ideology—they have become ONE with these agents of societal destruction.
Venerable, Established Institutions have infused themselves with a fatal virus. Many of their members carry this virus and have infected the structural components of the Institutions along with their members.
WHY IS THIS? HOW HAS THIS COME ABOUT?
The Federal Government can and should DESIGNATE such groups as TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS. BUT IT DOESN’T DO THIS.
THROUGH THEIR AGENDA, AIMS, ACTIONS, AND TACTICS, the Federal Government can and should surveil these organizations and should be assertive, even aggressive, in bringing their members—that perpetrate crimes against the Country, its institutions, its homes and businesses, and people—to swift justice. BUT IT DOESN’T DO THIS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THIS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, DOES NOT DO ANYTHING TO BUTTRESS SOCIETY FROM THE PLAGUE OF RADICAL LEFT DOGMA AND IDEOLOGY. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS, TO THE CONTRARY, EMBRACED IT, AND THRUST IT ON THE COUNTRY.
AMERICANS SEE THIS THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION’S POLICIES. THE COUNTRY HAS BECOME FRACTURED. THE ECONOMY IS WEAK. THE MILITARY IS WEAK. THE SOCIAL FABRIC IS FRAYING.
THE WORLD IS TODAY IN A PERILOUS CONDITION DUE TO SPECIFIC, DESTRUCTIVE FOREIGN POLICY DECISIONS ON THE PART OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, INJECTED INTO IT THAT HAVE DESTABILIZED IT.
THE CREATION OF VOLITILITY CANNOT REST SOLELY IN THE INCOMPETENCE OF THESE POLICY MAKERS. IT MUST BE INTENTIONAL.
A WORLDWIDE TRANSFORMATION OF POLITICAL, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND JURIDICAL STRUCTURES IS OCCURRING, THE ERECTION OF A NEO-MARXIST EMPIRE IS THE AIM. BUT WHAT IS CONGRESS, SOCIAL MEDIA, THE BUSINESS SECTORS AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS IN OUR COUNTRY DOING ABOUT THIS?
CONGRESS, THE PRESS, SOCIAL MEDIA, THE BUSINESS SECTORS, AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS DO NOT PREVAIL ON THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO GRAPPLE WITH THE INTRACTABLE PROBLEM OF SOCIETAL AND WORLD DECAY WROUGHT BY THE IMMERSION OF RADICAL LEFT BELIEF SYSTEMS INTO OUR NATION AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION, GENERALLY.
MANY STATE GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DO NOTHING TO CURB THE SERIOUS HARM THESE RADICAL LEFT GROUPS AND THEIR MEMBERS CAUSE SOCIETY AND, BY EXTENSION, THE WORLD.
ARE ALL THESE INSTITUTIONS SIMPLY AND INEXPLICABLY OBLIVIOUS TO THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE PROBLEM, OR IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON HERE, BENEATH THE SURFACE THAT HAS ENABLED THE ROT OF RADICAL LEFT IDEOLOGY AND DOGMA TO TAKE HOLD?
Government at all levels and private sector institutions are THEMSELVES filled with RADICAL LEFT PERSONNEL AND LEADERS.
HOW HAS THIS HAPPENED? WHO OR WHAT SHAPED THIS?
Institutions across America take their cue from the present Biden Administration and Radical Leftist members of Congress.
The Press and Social Media organizations follow suit, heralding the actions of violent Marxists and Anarchists, echoing their sentiments, enabling them, apologizing for their horrific actions, proclaiming that the destruction of our Republic is all for the best—THAT IT IS ALL RIGHT AND PROPER, and GOOD AND MORAL.
And our “CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM” AS WELL is supposed to take a backseat to DELIBERATE DESTRUCTIVE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR? Really?
BUT WHY IS THAT? WHAT ARE THE MECHANISMS THAT HAVE ALLOWED THIS OR CAUSED THIS TO OCCUR?
Institutions that should protect the American people from the criminal conduct of these Radical Marxist and Anarchist groups and their members willingly, even enthusiastically, abet the criminal behavior. WHY IS THAT?
America’s institutions have cloaked an aura of respectability around these RADICAL LEFT groups and their members, AND HAVE WILLINGLY EMBRACED the Dogma and Goals of these groups, ADOPTING THEM AND APPLYING THEM TO THEIR OPERATIONS. WHY IS THAT? HOW DID THE RADICAL LEFT IDEOLOGY AND BELIEF SYSTEMS GAIN CONTROL OVER OUR INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR PEOPLE? BUT, THIS HAS HAPPENED? AND THE RADICAL LEFT IS NOW VERY MUCH AN INSTITUTION ITSELF, OVERLAID ON THE OTHERS BUT WHO REMAINS IN AMERICA TO RESTRAIN THE RELENTLESS, INEXORABLE ADVANCEMENT TOWARD RUIN?
An uninformed public sees incorrigible, criminal behavior treated as acceptable, even exemplary conduct. The public sees police deliberately failing to make arrests due to policy restrictions from senior police officials (political appointees) and city mayors. Years ago thieves attempted to cloak their thefts. Today, they haul off their plunder openly. California is a case study of this peculiar state of affairs. See, e.g., a story by the Hoover Institution on this. But, a “Radical Left Bastion State like California is no longer an outlier on this as is plain from a New York Post article. See also the article from Retail Dive.
Store employers, managers, and employees look on in disbelief, powerless to prevent the brazen theft lest they suffer criminal sanctions themselves for such “harm” they may cause to the criminals (working alone and often, now, in concert) in the event they attempt to prevent the theft of store inventory. Stores close and costs for the loss of the inventory are passed on to the consumer.
THE SOCIETAL FABRIC IS FRAYED.
The public must grudgingly allow serious, and increasingly constant, and vicious criminal behavior to occur and to accept that criminal behavior will go unpunished.
Some members of the public complain. Most simply tolerate the destruction of their society. And more than a few excuse it, with some of them even applauding it.
GOVERNMENTS HAVE NOW ROUTINELY FORCED POLICE—WHOSE DUTY IT IS TO PROTECT SOCIETY FROM THE ACTIONS OF CRIMINALS AND DEVIANTS WHO SEEK TO DESTROY IT—TO “SIT ON THEIR HANDS” AND “THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM” FAILS.
WHY IS THAT?
NO ONE CAN REASONABLY ASCRIBE THE EXTENT OF THIS, THE CONSTANCY OF IT, AND THE INTENSITY OF THIS TO SOME NOTION OF “ACCEPTABLE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.” What the public is witnessing today has no precedent in American history.
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENT AND MORE THAN A FEW STATE GOVERNMENTS AND MUNICIPALITIES HAVE JOINED IN ON THE RAPE OF THE COUNTRY. THEY HAVE ABUSED AND ESSENTIALLY REJECTED OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION, AND ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO TAKE THIS ALL IN STRIDE. WHY IS THAT?
THEY NO LONGER SIMPLY ABIDE BY AND TOLERATE THE DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OF THESE ORIGINAL NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST RADICAL LEFT CULTISTS. AND THEY NO LONGER SIMPLY EXCUSE THE DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OF THESE ORIGINAL NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST RADICAL LEFT CULTISTS. AND THEY NO LONGER SIMPLY PRAISE, LAUD, AND ENCOURAGE THE DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OF THESE ORIGINAL NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST RADICAL LEFT CULTISTS. NO! THEY HAVE COMPLETELY IMMERSED THEMSELVES IN THE RHETORIC, DOGMA, IDEOLOGICAL BELIEF SYSTEM AND FOUNDATIONAL PHILOSOPHY. AND, THEY HAVE FULLY INCULCATED THE AGENDA, AIMS, TACTICS, AND STRATEGY INTO THE POLICIES OF THESE ORIGINAL NEO-MARXISTS AND ANARCHISTS. THEY HAVE THEREFORE MERGED WITH AND INTO THEM.
AS A COMPONENT OF THESE ORIGINAL NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST ORGANIZATIONS THEY ARE THE RADICAL LEFT NO LESS THAN THE ORIGINAL IDEALOGUES AND PARTICIPANTS IN VIOLENCE.
These Neo-Marxists and Anarchists proclaim that they don’t commit violence for the sake of violence BUT that such VIOLENCE is done in the name of “SOCIAL JUSTICE”—OH!—and a NEW ONE, “RACIAL JUSTICE.” These Neo-Marxists and Anarchists proclaim that they don’t commit violence for the sake of violence BUT that such VIOLENCE is done in the name of RACIAL JUSTICE (hence, use of the prefix ‘NEO’ AS AFFIXED TO THE WORD, ‘MARXIST’).
IT SOUNDS SO “GOODY-GOODY” to the UNINFORMED, THOSE ILL-INFORMED, AND THOSE EASILY MANIPULATED.
BUT——
IT’S ALL HOGWASH! Yet, MUCH of the public believes IN THIS IMPERATIVE OF “SOCIAL JUSTICE” and “RACIAL JUSTICE”—VOCIFEROUSLY PROCLAIMED AND MAGNIFIED ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
BUT NO ONE BOTHERS TO DEFINE THESE CONCEPTS. THEY GO UNEXPLAINED, JUST PROFESSED WITH A SMUG CERTAINTY IN THE TRUTH OF THEM. WHY?
THE ANSWER IS THIS——
SO MUCH OF OUR SOCIETY—GOVERNMENT, THE PRIVATE SECTOR, AND MUCH OF THE PUBLIC, TOO, IS CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH.
THESE NEO-MARXISTS AND ANRCHISTS HAVE CAPTURED WHOLE SWATHS OF SOCIETY.
And, with few heard to complain, these Neo-Marxists and Anarchists pontificate endlessly and vehemently.
Their polemics consist of vacuous and vague pronouncements, both incoherent and self-contradictory.
BUT THIS IS OF NO CONSEQUENCE. AND FEW CARE.
And all the Nonsense is amplified by SOCIAL MEDIA.
IT IS ALL GIVEN THE GOOD HOUSEKEEPING SEAL OF APPROVAL FROM THE PRESS AND FROM THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION.
THIS MAMMOTH “ADMINISTRATIVE STATE” CONTINUES ITS AGENDA TO DISMANTLE THE CONSTITUTION AND THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COUNTRY UNIMPEDED.
IT IS ALL REMARKABLE.
For, these Neo-Marxists and Anarchists are an eclectic, ragtag assortment of RABID and FANATIC PSEUDO ACADEMIC IDEALOGUES, SOCIOPATHS and PSYCHOPATHS, SOCIETAL MALCONTENTS and OUTRIGHT LUNATICS.
And some AVERAGE AMERICANS have BECOME ACOLYTES OF THE CULT OF NEO-MARXISM or are sensitive to the messaging—all aided by a massive PROPAGANDA MACHINE OF GOVERNMENT and THE PRESS, BOTH CONTROLLED BY THAT OTHER MAJOR COMPONENT OF THE “RADICAL LEFT”: THE NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST “ELITE,” many of whom are presently attending their annual meeting in DAVOS, SWITZERLAND.
This “THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM of 2024” in DAVOS is communicated and hyped by the PRESS. See infra.
BUT BRINGING MERELY SOME AMERICANS INTO THE FOLD OF THE “RADICAL SOCIALIST LEFT” THOUGHT AND DOGMA ISN’T ENOUGH.
THE GOAL? ALL AMERICANS MUST BUY INTO THIS NEW SOCIO-POLITICAL-ECONOMIC DYNAMIC.
They are expected TO ACCEDE to the WHOLESALE DESTRUCTION OF SOCIETY or, if they happen to have THE WRONG ATTITUDE, then they are compelled TO ACCEPT the inevitability of societal ruin, THAT THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA INTO THE SOCIALIST COLLECTIVIST DREAM OF A VAST MULTICULTURAL WORLD EMPIRE CAN TAKE SHAPE UNIMPEDED AND EVENTUALLY MATERIALIZE—SANS INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN NATION-STATES AND SANS INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTY, THE CONCEPTS OF WHICH WILL BE REDUCED TO QUAINT FICTIONS OF A PAST BETTER OFF DEAD AND ULTIMATELY LOST FROM MEMORY.
And, so, CRIME CONTINUES UNABATED, THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FAILS, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE PRESS, SOCIAL MEDIA GROUPS, THE VENERABLE INSTITUTIONS in AMERICA, AND MANY MEMBERS OF the PUBLIC turn a BLIND EYE TO THE WELL-BEING OF AMERICA TO THEIR CONSTITUTION, TO THEIR COUNTRYMEN, AND THEMSELVES.
WHY WOULD AMERICANS FOLLOW A BELIEF SYSTEM AND DOGMA, IDEOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY, THAT CALL FOR THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION AS “AMERICANS?”
MOST Americans CAN SURELY see from where the danger to our Country springs and ARE WELL AWARE OF THOSE WHO BEAR RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENDANGERING THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE. YET THEY DO NOTHING ABOUT IT, EITHER BECAUSE THEY FEEL POWERLESS TO DO ANYTHING TO PREVENT THE RUIN OF EVERYTHING THEY ONCE HELD NEAR AND DEAR TO THEM OR BECAUSE THEY HAVE FALLEN PREY TO FALSE MESSAGING—FIERCE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING THAT HAS WARPED BOTH INTELLECT AND BASIC ANIMAL INSTINCT FOR SURVIVAL.
AND, THESE NEW CAPTIVE INSTITUTIONS OF SOCIETY HAVE NOW SWORN ALLEGIANCE TO POWERFUL INFLUENCERS WHOSE GOALS AND IMPULSES ARE DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO THE PRESERVATION OF A COUNTRY GROUNDED ON THE TENETS, PRECEPTS, AND PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUALISM, AND ON THE SANCTITY, AND INVIOLABILITY, AND INTEGRITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL MIND, SOUL, AND SPIRIT, AND ON THE SINGULAR IMPORTANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.
THESE CAPTIVE INSTITUTIONS NO LONGER FEEL A NEED OR A DUTY TO PRESERVE AN INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE AND FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
THESE INSTITUTIONS NO LONGER FEEL AN IMPULSE TO SECURE A WONDROUS NATION FOR BOTH THEMSELVES AND THEIR DESCENDANTS THAT HAS HERETOFORE SURVIVED AND THRIVED IN BOTH GOOD TIMES AND ADVERSITY.
The TRUE DANGER to an INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN NATION AND FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC does not, then, rest merely in the actions of criminals and dangerous lunatics, terrorist organizations, and international criminal cartels.
They could all easily be dealt with if the Government wished to do so and if the PRESS and “BIG BUSINESS” WOULD PREVAIL ON THE GOVERNMENT TO DO SO.
The PRESS and the BROAD BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL SECTORS could prevail on the Federal Government TO ADHERE TO ITS OBLIGATIONS under the Constitution, TO ENFORCE our Nation’s laws, and TO PROVIDE for the common good. BUT THEY DON’T DO THIS.
QUITE THE OPPOSITE.
THIS TREACHERY OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT UNDER THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, AND OF A HAPLESS, HELPLESS, INEFFECTIVE CONGRESS, AND A SEDITIOUS, DUPLICITOUS, PRESS AND SOCIAL MEDIA, AND OF THOSE SEDITIOUS, SCHEMING, RUTHLESS STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND OBSEQUIOUS “BIG BUSINESS” AND “BIG TECH,” DEMONSTRATE, THROUGH THEIR ACTIONS, THE SOURCE OF OUR NATION’S WOES.
THESE SEEMINGLY VENERABLE INSTITUTIONS—BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE—CLAIM TO WORK FOR THE WELL-BEING OF THE COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE. FALSE!
ALL OF THEM, TOGETHER, POSE THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE SURVIVAL OF OUR COUNTRY AS A FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
THE RADICAL LEFT INCLUDES MUCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE PRESS, MANY STATE GOVERNMENTS, AND MANY OTHER INSTITUTIONS OF SOCIETY.
HOW, THEN, CAN AMERICA’S INSTITUTIONS REPEL THE DANGER TO THE VERY SOCIAL FABRIC OF SOCIETY IF THEY ARE PART AND PARCEL OF IT?
THE ANSWER IS PLAIN. THEY CANNOT!
SUCH PRAISE HEAPED ON NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST ORGANIZATIONS IS NECESSARY TO DEFLECT ATTENTION TO A SEEMINGLY INCONGRUOUS FACT. OUR NATION HAS TURNED ITSELF INSIDE OUT.
THE GOVERNMENT AND THE OTHER ONCE VENERABLE INSTITUTIONS OF OUR COUNTRY ARE IN BED WITH—ONE WITH—THOSE ORGANIZATIONS THE GOVERNMENT HAD ONCE SOUGHT TO KEEP IN CHECK AND WHICH OUR ONCE OTHER VENERABLE INSTITUTIONS HAD RIGHTFULLY AND JUSTIFIABLY TREATED WITH CONTEMPT.
Hence, Neo-Marxist and Anarchist terror organizations in vogue today, particularly BLACK LIVES MATTER (“BLM”) and ANTIFA, ARE NO DIFFERENT FROM THOSE OF THE PAST. The only thing different is that THE INSTITUTIONS OF AMERICA HAVE BECOME ONE WITH THEM.
BLM and ANTIFA serve merely as a RABBLE MOB, doing its fair share of the dirty work to disrupt society. And they are happy enough to do what comes naturally to them.
Lauded by the Government, the Press, and Big Business and Big Tech, the Dogmas and Agenda of the RADICAL LEFT CRIMINAL GROUPS are THRUST ON a naïve and unsuspecting public—the target of a well-orchestrated and implemented campaign of insidious messaging.
WHERE ONCE DENOUNCED, RADICAL NEO-MARXIST AND ANARCHIST GROUPS ARE NOW ABSURDLY ACCLAIMED BY THE PRESS, BY THE BROADCAST AND CABLE ”NEWS” AND COMMENTARY ORGANS, AND BY SOCIAL MEDIA, ALL IN A BID TO ENTICE THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT THEM TO JOIN IN THEIR CAUSE—TO REJOICE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF A SOCIETY GROUNDED IN THE TENETS, PRECEPTS, AND PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUALISM, INTO A SOCIETY THAT IS GROUNDED ON THE TENETS, PRECEPTS, AND PRINCIPLES OF NEO-MARXIST COLLECTIVISM.
WHITHER OUR NATION’S SUCCESS AND PROSPERITY?
Our NATION’S SUCCESS AND PROSPERITY are no accident. They derive from the TENETS, PRECEPTS, AND PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUALISM, AS REFLECTED IN OUR CONSTITUTION.
THE KEY TO OUR NATION’S SUCCESS, PROSPERITY, AND POWER DERIVES FROM A CORE BELIEF: RECOGNITION OF THE SANCTITY AND INVIOLABILITY OF THE HUMAN SOUL, SPIRIT, AND MIND. THAT CORE BELIEF IS THE BEDROCK OF OUR BELIEF IN AND ADORATION OF OUR NATURAL LAW RIGHTS BESTOWED UPON MAN BY THE DIVINE CREATOR, FROM WHOM OUR MORALITY ALSO DERIVES. ALL THIS THE RADICAL LEFT DENIES, AND STRIVES TO ERASE, TO ERADICATE BECAUSE THIS CORE BELIEF, THIS SALIENT TRUTH, THIS PROOF OUR SINGULAR GREATNESS IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH NEO-MARXISM AND WILL NOT BE BORNE. THAT EXPLAINS THE RADICAL LEFT’S INTENTION TO PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS TO UNDERMINE AMERICA’S FAITH IN ITS PAST, IN ITS FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES, AND IN ITSELF.
THE DEPRAVITY OF OUR ONCE VENERABLE INSTITUTIONS THAT HAVE ENGAGED IN DUPLICITY, HYPOCRISY, AND DECEIT TO SEDUCE AND CAJOLE AMERICANS TO DENY THEIR NATION’S FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND CORE BELIEFS RAISES ANOTHER TANTALIZING QUESTION WHICH IS THIS:
ASIDE FROM THE MORAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ACCEDING TO OR ADOPTING THE DOGMAS AND AGENDA OF THESE NEO-MARXIST-ANARCHIST TERRORIST GROUPS, WHY, ON PRAGMATIC GROUNDS, ALONE, WOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND MANY STATE GOVERNMENTS REJECT THE NATION, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE WELL-BEING OF AMERICANS, GIVEN THAT OUR COUNTRY HAS BECOME THE MOST SUCCESSFUL, AND PROSPEROUS NATION ON EARTH?
Their TREACHERY is EXTENSIVE, EXPANSIVE, PERVASIVE, and EXTRAORDINARILY DESTRUCTIVE.
WHAT IS THE IMPETUS FOR COMPLETE CAPITULATION TO RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISM-ANARCHISM SUCH THAT THE NATION’S INSTITUTIONS—OF GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS AND FINANCE, OF THE PRESS AND MEDIA AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, OF ACADEMIA AND EDUCATION, OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT—WOULD SUBMIT UNCONDITIONALLY TO RADICAL LEFT COLLECTIVIST IDEOLOGY?
THE IDEOLOGY OF NEO-MARXIST RADICALISM IS THE ANTITHESIS OF “CLASSICAL LIBERALISM,” THE LATTER OF WHICH IS GROUNDED ON THE PRECEPTS OF FREEDOM AND LIBERTY; ON THE ACQUISITION OF AND RESPECT FOR ONE’S EXCLUSIVE USE OF AND THE ENJOYMENT OF HIS PRIVATE PROPERTY; ON EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY; APPLICATION OF FREE MARKET CAPITALISM; EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW FOR EVERY MAN; THE EXERCISE OF ONE’S NATURAL LAW RIGHTS WITHOUT HINDRANCE FROM GOVERNMENT; CHECKS ON GOVERNMENTAL USE OF POWER; AND ALLOWANCE FOR ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH ONE’S MERIT AND THEREBY ENJOYMENT OF THE FRUITS OF ONE’S EFFORT JUSTLY DERIVED FROM ONE’S MERIT.
THE APPLICATION OF THE RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXIST DOGMA “DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION” (“DEI”) IS THE ANTITHESIS OF “CLASSICAL LIBERALISM.”
NEO-MARXIST RADICALISM, ABHORS THIS AND HAS, IN OUR COUNTRY, EFFECTIVELY SUPERSEDED CLASSICAL LIBERALISM. IT IS THE OBVERSE OF CLASSICAL LIBERALISM.
THE RADICAL LEFT’S VIRAL MEMES HAVE INFECTED THE BODY POLITIC, IMPRINTING THEMSELVES ON THE PSYCHE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THEY HAVE INFECTED THE MINDS OF MILLIONS OF AMERICANS.
Although not physical, these viral memes are just as lethal as any dangerous physical pathogen.
The infection is seen in the peculiar acceptance of BLM by the Federal Government and by Congressional Democrats who treat these Groups as something other and apart from “criminal” organizations. But that is what they are.
And the Press is loath to condemn these groups for what they are.
The NY Times, for example, had besmirched President Trump for having the audacity of seeking to declare the ANARCHIST “ANTIFA” as a Terrorist organization. Fancy that!
During the final months of the campaign in 2020 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL RACE, which saw THE INVESTITURE of the “GREAT PRETENDER-STOOGE”—JOE BIDEN—, the NY Times waxed poetic over “ANTIFA,” lauding this TERROR GROUP with propagandistic blather:
As President Trump and his Democratic opponent, Joseph R. Biden Jr., enter the final stretch of the presidential campaign, a loosely affiliated group of far-left anti-fascism activists, known as ‘antifa,’ has been the focus of a series of misleading rumors and false claims.
Seeking to assign blame for the protests against racial injustice that spread across the United States this summer, President Trump has said that the United States would designate antifa as a terrorist organization. The president’s critics noted, however, that the United States does not have a domestic terrorism law and that antifa, a contraction of the phrase ‘anti-fascist,’ is not an organization with a leader, a defined structure or membership roles.
Rather, antifa is more of a loose movement of activists whose followers share some philosophies and tactics. They have made their presence known at protests around the country in recent years, including the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017.
Mr. Trump has also sought to tie Mr. Biden to “radical left” groups, including antifa — even though Mr. Biden opposes defunding the police, has repeatedly condemned violence and property damage associated with the protests, and has called for “arsonists and anarchists” to be prosecuted. . . .
Antifa members campaign against actions they view as authoritarian, homophobic, racist or xenophobic. Although antifa is not affiliated with other movements on the left — and is sometimes viewed as a distraction by other organizers — its members sometimes work with other local activist networks that are rallying around the same issues, such as the Occupy movement or Black Lives Matter.
Misinformation about the group often spreads through personal networks online. In many cases, false or misleading claims appear first in a tweet, Facebook post or YouTube video before they are shared through community texting networks, Facebook groups or the neighborhood social networking app Nextdoor.
Supporters generally seek to stop what they see as fascist, racist and far-right groups from having a platform to promote their views, arguing that public demonstration of those ideas leads to the targeting of marginalized people, including racial minorities, women and members of the L.G.B.T.Q. community.
The argument is that militant anti-fascism is inherently self-defense because of the historically documented violence that fascists pose, especially to marginalized people,” said Mark Bray, a history lecturer at Rutgers University and the author of “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.”
Many antifa organizers also participate in more peaceful forms of community organizing, but they believe that using violence is justified because of their views that if racist or fascist groups are allowed to organize freely, “it will inevitably result in violence against marginalized communities,” said Mr. Bray, whose defense of the anti-fascist movement incited criticism and generated support at Dartmouth College when he was a lecturer there.
The New York Times is an apologist for Radical Left groups. That is no surprise. And no one should be surprised that the NY Times itself is a component of the Radical Left, and Joe Biden and his Administration are as well.
That he ran as a MODERATE should not have fooled anyone except the most naïve.
And, as we see, the habitually, incorrigibly corrupt Biden Administration has quietly transformed the DOJ/FBI into a SECRET STATE POLICE/DOMESTIC SECRET SECURITY SERVICE modeled after the German GESTAPO/SS-SD.
The problem for this “RADICAL LEFT” controlled Biden Administration is that the U.S. CONSTITUTION/BILL OF RIGHTS and our MAMMOTH BODY OF CASE LAW, CONGRESSIONAL STATUTES, AND JURISPRUDENCE serve somewhat to constrain the Administration.
But, consolidation and usurpation of powers of the Executive Branch of Government has, in three short years, along with the RADICAL LEFT’S control over many other institutions in the Nation, yielded a COLOSSAL, POWERFUL TYRANNICAL STRUCTURE, emboldening it to IGNORE, OVERRIDE, or TOY WITH the CONSTITUTION and LAWS of our FREE REPUBLIC.
In June 2019 and August 2019, the Radical Left seditious NY Times called for a federal law targeting domestic terrorism.
The Patriot Act of 2001 did target domestic terrorism, but the Act referred to international terrorists, namely, and especially, Islamic Terrorists, that operated within the United States.
But the Biden Administration’s DOJ/FBI had something other than INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS OPERATING IN THE TERRITORIAL UNITED STATES when it commenced its attack on “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.”
It was quietly at work—likely without Trump’s knowledge (as Donald Trump was U.S. President at the time)—laying the groundwork for a schema to target U.S. Citizens themselves, i.e., the very citizens who happen to support Trump.
The NY Times discussed this targeting of American citizens PRESUMPTIVELY RIGHT-WING “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS” (BUT NOT LEFT-WING “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS”—NEVER “LEFT-WING DOMESTIC TERRORISTS), and likely did so with some glee. See NY Times articles published on June 4, 2019, and August 7, 2019.
DID THE DOJ/FBI—ANTICIPATING, EXPECTING, PERHAPS KNOWING OF A TRUMP LOSS IN THE COMING 2020 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, quietly lay the groundwork for an ATTACK ON U.S CITIZENS WHOSE BELIEF SYSTEMS WERE DEEMED ANTITHETICAL WITH A NEW POLITICAL REALITY?
Is this idea far-fetched? We think not. And it explains the insistent, incessant, meticulous attacks on Trump, using judicial and extrajudicial means, from the time he took the Oath of Office in January 2017 to the present day.
The attempt by the RADICAL LEFT to destroy this man professionally, financially, and personally has no precedent in American history.
The perpetrators have no scruples, morally or legally about any of it.
The pervasiveness and intensity of it have led to a curious complacency by the public toward it, a sense of normalcy about it, and pervading it—some even deriving pleasure over it.
BUT AT LEAST HALF THE POPULATION IS RIGHTFULLY APPALLED BY THIS OBVIOUS RAPE OF JUSTICE BY A RADICAL LEFT-CONTROLLED EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND BY SEVERAL RADICAL-LEFT-CONTROLLED STATE GOVERNMENTS, USURPING POWER IN AN UNCONSCIONABLE ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT THE ELECTORAL PROCESS.
They are rightfully horrified by this incessant assault on our Nation’s 45th President.
The amount of taxpayer money EXPENDED UNLAWFULLY to destroy a man who had—unlike recent past Presidents and the present GREAT PRETENDER OCCUPYING “THE OVAL OFFICE”—remained true to his OATH OF OFFICE, AND HE IS CRUCIFIED BECAUSE OF IT! WHAT GREATER EVIDENCE IS THERE OF TYRANNY NOW UPON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
AND THIS RAISES A HOST OF DEEPER QUESTIONS——
WHY WOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE PRESS, AND SOCIAL MEDIA PROPAGANDIZE ON BEHALF OF RUTHLESS ACTIVIST GROUPS THAT INTEND TO DESTROY THE NATION AND A FREE AND SOVEREIGN PEOPLE?
WHY HAVE SOME STATES AND SO MANY OTHER INSTITUTIONS FASTENED THEMSELVES TO THESE FORCES INVOLVED IN THE CORRUPTION OF AND IN THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR COUNTRY—OSTENSIBLY BUT DISINGENUOUSLY CLAIMING TO DO SO ALL IN THE NAME OF SAVING IT?
WHAT COULD TURN POWERFUL INSTITUTIONS OF OUR COUNTRY AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE, DEFYING THE CONSTITUTION AND BRINGING ABOUT THE DEMISE OF THE MOST POWERFUL, SUCCESSFUL NATION THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN—AND A NATION CONCEIVED IN FREEDOM AND LIBERTY? [THIS QUERY RAISED SUPRA]
WHO OR WHAT IS BEHIND THIS EFFORT TO BRING ABOUT THE DISSOLUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE SUBJUGATION OF ITS PEOPLE?
Of course, this MAMMOTH RADICAL LEFT ENTERPRISE would likely deny the efficacy of the questions. But the DISMANTLING OF OUR CONSTITUTION—THE FRAMEWORK OF OUR COUNTRY—IS OBSERVABLE TO ALL WHO DEIGN TO USE THEIR EYES AND BRAIN TO DIGEST THE ASSAULT ON THEIR COUNTRY. AND SO—
THE AFORESAID QUESTIONS BEG FOR AN ANSWER. NONE TO DATE, TO MY MIND, IS FORTHCOMING. I DON’T SEE ANYONE EVEN ASKING THESE QUESTIONS. WHY IS THAT? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS TOO BUSY IMPLMENTING THE RADICAL LEFT AGENDA TO TROUBLE ITSELF TO ASK AND RESPOND TO THESE TROUBLING QUESTIONS.
The DOJ/FBI demonstrates this clearly and unequivocally through its callous, cold, smug, and deliberate misuse of law and the Constitution to attack Trump and to attack many average Americans who happen to demonstrate disaffection with the BIDEN ADMINISTRATION and with other elements of the RADICAL LEFT.
ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND IS ONE MORE TOOL OF AND WITHIN THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION. THE ADMINISTRATION IS A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT OF THE RADICAL LEFT. IT OPERATES AS A TYRANNICAL DESPOT—A POTENTATE, MAKING A PRETENSE OF ADHERING TO LAW AND CONSTITUTION WHILE SHREDDING BOTH.
The operative legal phrase is “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.” But the onslaught of prosecutorial vindictiveness leveled on Trump and on many other Americans goes well beyond mere occasional incidents of prosecutorial misconduct.
WHAT AMERICANS ARE SEEING IS DEFIANCE OF THE LAW AND OF THE CONSTITUTION IN THE FURTHERANCE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY ANTITHETICAL TO THE WILL AND WELFARE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND DETRIMENTAL TO AND DESTRUCTIVE OF CONSTITUTION, OUR SYSTEM OF LAW, AND OF OUR JURISPRUDENCE THAT UNDERPIN THE DOCTRINE OF FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS UNDER THE LAW.
This is worsened by the actions of Government agents and prosecutors who go through the pretense of utilizing law and the Constitution ethically, responsibly, and fairly when, all the while, they are intentionally and callously misusing both for blatantly partisan and, even more, nefarious purposes—FAR MORE NEFARIOUS PURPOSES—TREACHERY TO NATION, CONSTITUTION, AND PEOPLE.
Merrick Garland, during his Press Conferences, claims the DOJ/FBI applies the law fairly, rationally, and objectively—that all are treated equally before the law.
He undertakes his polemic robotically as an afterthought, ostensibly to hide unethical and illegal conduct on the part of the DOJ and the FBI, thereby only compounding the harm done to the law, the Constitution, and our Nation’s jurisprudence.
THE RADICAL LEFT’S UNDERMINING OF THE UNITED STATES AS AN INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN NATION-STATE AND FREE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WHERE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE SOVEREIGN OVER GOVERNMENT IS BUT ONE PART OF A BROADER AGENDA—IMPORTANT AS THAT EFFORT IS TO THE RADICAL LEFT’S OVERALL OBJECTIVE—THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL NATION-STATES AND THE REALIZATION OF A ONE-WORLD OLIGARCHIC, COLLABORATIVE NEO-MARXIST-CORPORATIST SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT.
THE RADICAL LEFT NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST ELITES HAVE PROVIDED AN INKLING OF THEIR AGENDA IN THE COMING YEARS IN TERMS OF A NEW SOCIO-POLITICAL-ECONOMIC REALITY FOR THE WORLD.
This was made clear during addresses at the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM of 2024.
The World Economic Forum, held as always in DAVOS, SWITZERLAND, commenced with the keynote address of UN Secretary-General António Guterres on January 17, 2024. He said in part,
I am confident we can build a new, multipolar global order with new opportunities for leadership, and with balance and justice in international relations.
But multipolarity creates complexity.
Left to itself, it could deepen fault lines: between North and South; East and West; developed and developing economies; within the G20; and between the G20 and everyone else.
The only way to manage this complexity and avoid a slide into chaos is through a reformed, inclusive, networked multilateralism.
Now this requires strong multilateral institutions and frameworks, and effective mechanisms of global governance.
And Klaus Schwab, the irrepressible, haughty Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum began his address in DAVOS-2024 with these remarks:
Today, we stand at a unique juncture in human history, facing challenges that are as diverse as they are profound.
The special role of the World Economic Forum is not to look at just one single issue, instead, it is the place at the beginning of each year to analyze the state of the world in a systemic and strategic way, and to find common ground to generate positive impact.
Geopolitically, our world is more interconnected, yet paradoxically, more divided than ever. Economically, we grapple with sluggish growth, and with inequalities and uncertainties that threaten the very fabric of our societies. Environmentally, we confront the relentless challenges of climate change, a threat to our planet's delicate balance. And technologically, we navigate uncharted waters, where innovation offers boundless opportunities but also unprecedented risks.
These deeply transformative challenges which are the cornerstone of our programme lead to uncertainty, generalized fear and pessimism. They force us into a mode of short-term crisis management – to the detriment of long-term strategic and sustainable solutions. This reactionary approach undermines our collective faith in the future and erodes the trust we place in our ability to shape a better world.
To break this cycle, we need a paradigm shift. We must rebuild trust – trust in our future, trust in our capacity to overcome challenges, and most importantly, trust in each other. Trust is not just a feeling; trust is a commitment to action, to belief, to hope.
To achieve this, we must rediscover and embrace the narrative that has driven humanity since its inception: acting as trustees for a better future.
This narrative isn't about short-term gains or individual successes; it's about stewardship, about preserving and enhancing our world for current and future generations. It is about understanding that our actions today have far-reaching consequences tomorrow.
This concept of trusteeship compels us to think beyond borders and beyond our lifetimes. It encourages collaboration over competition, sustainability over expediency, and empathy over apathy. As trustees of the future, we are responsible for advancing a world that is richer in possibilities, more equitable in opportunities, and more secure in its foundations.
Moreover, we, as leaders in government, business, and society, bear a particular responsibility to rebuild trust in how we assume our role as trustees.
The Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum is not a collective decision-making body, but its impact stems from the new insights gained through dialogue and interaction, and more importantly, from the commitments made by each participant to contribute more significantly in their respective areas of responsibility to solving our most pressing global issues.
As many of us here are in a privileged situation, we should not forget those who are suffering – from war, poverty, injustice, poor health, and more. This awareness will only enhance our collective efforts in creating a more inclusive and compassionate world through the work we do.
The cornerstone of our programme is our more than 100 initiatives. These are embedded into workgroups bringing together governments, business, civil society, and the best experts throughout the year at our headquarters in Geneva, and throughout the world, to make tangible progress in finding solutions for the key challenges on the global agenda.
For this Annual Meeting, while the vibrant atmosphere surrounding our gathering is a testament to its global significance, it is essential that we focus on our mission: committed to improving the state of the world by engaging into those action-oriented initiatives. The World Economic Forum is not just Davos, it is an engagement through the year.
In conclusion, trust is a fundamental pillar of our social, economic, and political life. It is vital for cooperation, social cohesion, and effective functioning of institutions. To rebuild trust there is a fundamental need to embody trusteeship, which means to care for the greater good. Let’s use this Annual Meeting to rebuild trust by exercising our trusteeship individually and collectively for safeguarding the future of humanity and nature.
And who is qualified to deal with these problems requiring a “PARADIGM SHIFT”—A NEW WORLD GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE SANS NATION-STATES WITH DEFINED AND DEMARCATED GEOGRAPHICAL/TERRITORIAL BORDERS?
The author of a U.S. News & World Report article on DAVOS-2024 published a few days before the meeting seems to assume that it is on the shoulders of the “ELITES” alone that populations of the world should depend for answers to the world’s problems “ELITES” will solve the problems facing the world and that is as it should be.
That would please Klaus Schwab. That is the salient point of his address. See Ben Shapiro's Podcast on Davos and Klaus Schwab, discussing Schwab and providing a glimpse of what the ultimate aim of the “World Economic Forum” is. See also The Publius National Post Review of A Patriot's History of Globalism: Its Rise and Decline, By Larry Schweikart, posted on January 24, 2024.
Never lose sight of the fact that it is these GLOBALIST “ELITES” (another major component of the RADICAL LEFT) who are THE CAUSE FOR THOSE PROBLEMS.
Is it not strange to depend on answers to problems to emanate from those responsible for the problems? But that is the message delivered over and over again at DAVOS.
AND WHILE THEY PRESUME TO SOLVE ALL THE WORLD’S PROBLEMS, THESE RADICAL LEFT GLOBALIST “ELITES” DESTROY NATION-STATES IN THE PROCESS, ALONG WITH SUCH THINGS AS NATURAL LAW FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES AND THEREUPON SUBJUGATE THE MASS OF HUMANITY. THAT IS THE PRICE HUMANITY PAYS TO HAVE THESE BIG SHOTS PRETEND TO CONSTRUCT THE BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS FOR ALL OF US. ISN’T THAT NICE?
The author of the aforementioned U.S. News & World Report piece highlights a few of those problems facing the world.
I did not find the content of the U.S. News & World Report fascinating. It is superficial and prosaic. I cite it here because it is the title, “DAVOS WELCOMES GLOBAL ELITES TO SOLVE WORLD’S PROBLEMS”, that immediately struck me.
Before reading the article, I thought the author of the article intended for his post to be sarcastic. The title struck me as sarcastic. And I thought that was intentional. It wasn’t. That is clear from a perusal of the article.
The U.S. News and World article, by Tim Smart, shows how out of touch the “MAINSTREAM MEDIA” (“MSM”) is with the American people.
So, the author WASN’T proffering a sarcastic take on DAVOS and the NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST ELITES as a lead-in to their grand entrance. The piece is intended to be dry and serious. Does the author presume to have any idea of the cost that THE COMMON MAN would have to pay for the services of these GLOBALIST “ELITES”?
An opinion by Jonathan Bronitsky Co-Founder, ATHOS, published in Newsweek, on November 1, 2022, answers this question. It is titled, Global Elites: “'No Money, No Problems' | Opinion.” The title of that article also hints (more than a little) of sarcasm with more than a touch of iron. From a perusal of the content of the opinion, the reader must wonder whether Bronitsky had Voltaire in mind, as the article reads like “Candide” updated to the present day. Plainly, Bronitsky DID intend his piece to read as SARCASTIC IRONY.
Bronitsky writes,
The Marxists of yesteryear just wanted you to have as much as your fellow citizen—no more, no less. Or at least that's what they claimed.
Today's totalitarians, by contrast, don't want you to have anything. They are globalist elites, and they're frank about their aims. Back in 2016, perhaps their most prized club, the World Economic Forum (WEF), largely known for its flashy annual meeting in the Alpine resort town of Davos, offered eight predictions for the world in 2030. The number one prediction, at the time, was literally: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy."
The rapper Notorious B.I.G. famously observed, "Mo money, mo problems." Global elites, however, desire that you subscribe to an utterly different dictum: "No money, no problems." Indeed, this isn't merely their "prediction"—it's their explicit plan. And don't be fooled. They won't be satiated by seizing all your material property. They want to own you. To do this, they will infiltrate, corrupt, and control every component of our humanity. This is the near-term future global elites seek, and one they're within striking distance of achieving given their extraordinary influence over the major institutions of high society. They were just awaiting the right moment to pounce.
Enter the COVID-19 pandemic. Since, according to the Left, no good crisis should go to waste, the WEF openly asserted in 2020 that "the COVID-19 crisis" was an inimitable moment that needed to be exploited to "improve the state of the world." It has since built upon that proclamation with the Great Reset initiative, a breathtakingly audacious framework for overhauling "the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models, and the management of a global commons." Practically ripped straight from the tyrannical revolutions of yore, the Great Reset initiative now also promises to build "a new social contract that honors the dignity of every human being."
Upon closer examination, what can be deciphered from the framework is that the WEF intends to will into existence its 2016 aim and render as many people as possible penniless serfs. In his contribution to Against the Great Reset, a recently released, must-read collection of essays, scholar Michael Anton makes this crucial point about the goal of our internationalist overlords. "Note that the WEF doesn't say they will own nothing, only that you will. They most assuredly will own a great deal—more than the considerable amount they already own, and you will make up the difference."
For this PARADIGM SHIFT to occur, as Schwab mentions, the destruction of the nation-state must follow. Tacitly, this must include the loss of NATURAL LAW RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES—a point Ben Shapiro makes in his podcast, that I cite supra.
THE LOSS OF NATURAL LAW RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WOULD PROBABLY NOT BOTHER THE DENIZENS OF THE EU AND OF THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH NATIONS. SUCH RIGHTS AS THEY HAVE ARE ONLY THOSE THAT GOVERNMENT DEIGNS TO PROVIDE THEM. BUT IT DOES TROUBLE SOME PERCEPTIVE INDIVIDUALS. JUST ASK JORDAN PETERSON, WHO POINTED OUT, IN A COMMENT POSTED IN THE CANADIAN PUBLICATION, “NATIONAL POST,” ON JANUARY 17, 2024,
“Canadians, mark my words: Your much-vaunted Charter of Rights isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on, . . . .” But, then, the “CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS” are not and was never intended to be A CODIFICATION OF TRUE NATURAL LAW RIGHTS, UNLIKE AMERICANS’ “BILL OF RIGHTS.
AMERICA’S “BILL OF RIGHTS” IS A CODIFICATION OF TRUE NATURAL LAW FUNDAMENTAL, UNALIENABLE, ETERNAL, ILLIMITABLE RIGHTS, PREEXISTENT IN MAN, BEYOND THE LAWFUL POWER OF GOVERNMENT TO TAMPER WITH.
AND ONE RIGHT—THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS— MAKES PLAIN THAT AMERICANS (MOST AMERICANS AT ANY RATE WHOSE MINDS HAVEN’T BEEN POISONED BY THE RADICAL LEFT PROPAGANDISTS) HAVE BOTH THE MEANS AND WILL TO REPEL TYRANNY OF GOVERNMENT.
THE RADICAL LEFT BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TRIES TO DEFEAT AMERICANS’ NATURAL LAW RIGHTS IN MANY A ROUNDABOUT WAY BY DILUTING THE POPULATION WITH MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL UNASSIMILABLE ALIENS WHO HAVE NO COMPREHENSION OF THE IMPORT AND PURPORT OF NATURAL LAW RIGHTS.
THEY COMPRISE A VAST SHAPELESS BLOB OF USELESS FREELOADERS, INTERSPERSED WITH RABID, MURDEROUS, PSYCHOPATHIC MEMBERS OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CARTELS AND COLD, CALCULATING, CALLOUS PSYCHOTIC INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.
In the United States, Americans observe all this occurring apace, with millions of these illegal aliens marching up to and over or through our Nation’s borders and our Nation’s Border Patrol officers must wave them through.
AN OPEN SOUTHERN BORDER IS WHAT THE RADICAL LEFT NEO-MARXISTS AND NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST “ELITES” WANT AND AN OPEN SOUTHERN BORDER IS WHAT THE CORRUPT RADICAL LEFT BIDEN ADMINISTRATION HAS DELIVERED SINCE TAKING OVER THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT IN JANUARY 2021.
Biden’s Department of Homeland Security is instrumental in effectuating this, in defiance of our Nation’s comprehensive immigration and naturalization laws. The Neo-Marxists are behind this effort, as are the Neoliberal Globalist Elites. They are components of the “RADICAL LEFT” (see footnote infra).
THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THE RADICAL LEFT IS TO USHER IN A ONE-WORLD AMORPHOUS INTERNATIONALIST SOCIALIST ORDER PRESIDED OVER BY AN OLIGARCHY COMPRISING GLOBALIST “ELITES” AND NEO-MARXIST CLERICS.
BUT THERE WAS SOME PUSHBACK AT DAVOS THIS YEAR.
The President of Argentina and the President of the Heritage Foundation took these “ELITES” to task.
See, e.g., the articles in World (WNG); two from The Daily Signal, both posted on the same date: January 18, 2024: here and here; a message from the President of the Heritage Foundation; and a second one from the Heritage Foundation, dated January 12, 2024; and one from Business and Politics (BPR), dated January 19, 2024.
One must wonder why naysayers of the “DAVOS ELITES” would be invited. Was it perhaps to allow them to have the floor so they could be mocked? Surely, there was an ulterior motive at work here.
Radical Left Neo-Marxist and Anarchist groups, along with Governments around the world, grease the skids on behalf of the DAVOS CROWD and others to assist in the wholesale destruction of Present PARADIGM predicated on the concept of independent nation-states.
The RADICAL LEFT INTENDS TO WEAKEN THE PREEMINENCE OF NATION-STATES BY FRACTURING SOCIETAL COHESION IN THOSE NATION-STATES, THEREBY bringing about this “PARADIGM SHIFT” in all Western nations and, not least of all, the United States. That is Klaus Schwab’s ambition.
As in the EU, Klaus Schwab and others see Governments forced to accede control over policy decisions to the dictates of TECHNOCRATS, WORKING ON BEHALF OF THE WEALTHY GLOBAL ELITES.
This idea were it to come to fruition would have a decisive negative impact on the citizenry of the U.S. The principles of individual FREEDOM and LIBERTY are incompatible with the “PARADIGM SHIFT” that Schwab and others have in mind.
They see the concepts of FREEDOM and LIBERTY as “messy” and impediments to the EFFICIENT APPLICATION of TECHNOCRATIC EDICTS.
A COLLECTIVIST SOCIETY REQUIRES UNIFORMITY IN THOUGHT AND CONDUCT AMONG THE PROLETARIAN MASSES. NECESSARILY, THAT LEADS TO CONSTRAINTS ON INDIVIDUAL EXPRESSION, THE EPITOME OF FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.
I continue to hone these points in the next segment, PART THREE, drawing on remarks from Greg Kelly’s book, “Justice For All”, for support.
_________________________________________________
*The expression ‘RADICAL LEFT, like the acronym ‘MAGA’, has become ubiquitous in American politics.
Both have SOCIO-POLITICAL connotations. Like all such pervasive expressions, overuse of the expressions in discourse, absent any definition and explication creates confusion in the mind of the target audience. This confusion is intentional.
Take the word, ‘Democracy.’ What does the term mean? It has no simple definition, and it is not easy to decipher.
Historians, philosophers, and experts in political science and theory have for millennia, up to and through the present time, written extensive and intensive essays and tracts on it and about it, and will continue to do so.
Congressional Democrats love to use it but never trouble themselves to define it. It is one of those things that politicians elicit to “TRIGGER” an emotional “positive” response in the public psyche rather than to convey meaning to spur cognitive recognition and a desire for rigorous cognitive reflection, especially given the dire state of affairs facing this Country both on the NATIONAL and GEOPOLITICAL fronts.
Democrats use it incessantly and emphatically and always to suggest that they, rather than ‘MODERATE’ REPUBLICANS” “POLITICAL CONSERVATIVES”,—and more to the point, “TRUMP CONSERVATIVES”—LACK the CAPACITY FOR UNDERSTANDING “DEMOCRACY” and seek to impose “AUTOCRACY” on America.
THIS IS ALL UTTER ROT, but many Americans buy into the implausibility of it and are blind to the AUTOCRACY-TYRANNY all around them, already imposed on them, by the BIDEN ADMINISTRATION and those orchestrating the Administration’s every decision.
Curiously, the American public never hears Congressional Democrats use the expression “REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY” and, rarely, the term ‘REPUBLIC,’ both of which convey more accurately the nature of our political structure.
What they allude to is akin to “DIRECT DEMOCRACY”, a thing the FOUNDERS of our Republic, the FRAMERS of our CONSTITUTION, surely considered and promptly threw into the dustbin, both the FEDERALISTS and ANTIFEDERALISTS among them, as they knew such construction would invariably lead to MOBOCRACY and MAJORITARIAN TYRANNY—THINGS ANTITHETICAL TO PRESERVATION OF FUNDAMENTAL UNALIENABLE, PREEXISTENT, ILLIMITABLE AND UNMODIFIABLE NATURAL LAW RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES.
I am seeing this very thing occurring, despite THE IMPORT OF DIVINE LAW, AND THE PLAIN MEANING OF THE WORDS OF THE CONSTITUTION, AND U.S. SUPREME COURT IMPRIMATUR.
How many times have I heard from POLITICIANS and THE PRESS that a MAJORITY of AMERICANS want to see, rabidly insist upon, enactment of more “COMMON-SENSE” GUN LAWS—without any understanding of what such SLIPPERY SLOPE thinking, as is evidenced from what has already occurred, means: AN EFFORTLESS IMPOSITION OF TYRANNY ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE—INVASIVE AND OPPRESSIVE TO AN EXTENT THAT THOSE AMERICANS WHO BELIEVE IN “DEMOCRACY” HAVE NEVER SEEN AND CANNOT EVEN IMAGINECANNOT, CONCEIVE OF GIVEN THE PERSUASIVE FORCEFULNESS PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING DUE TO ADVANCES IN THE ART AND SCIENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONING.
Consider how the acronym “MAGA” which is essentially nothing more than a shorthand descriptor for “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN”—Donald Trump’s principal slogan during the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—has become a POLITICAL TERM in its own right, LESS because Trump had thought to make it so, but MORE because the “RADICAL LEFT” (see explanation infra) has insisted on making it so.
Trump recently pointed out in a 2020 U.S. Presidential Campaign speech that “MAGA” simply means “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.” The point is that no one American can rationally take issue with that without also denying one’s identity as a citizen of the United States.
It is far easier for the RADICAL LEFT to transform the import of the term “MAGA” into an outright ‘PEJORATIVE’ than it is to transform the phrase “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” into a PEJORATIVE.
How incongruous does it sound for a RADICAL LEFT POLITICIAN LIKE BIDEN to bellow out—
“‘MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN’ ELEMENTS IN AMERICA INTEND TO OVERTURN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS AND TO DESTROY ‘DEMOCRACY’”?
Does that not confuse the target audience—THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN SEDUCED TO LITERALLY “HATE” TRUMP?
Does not the RADICAL LEFT POLITICIAN better influence his target audience with:
“‘MAGA FORCES’ IN AMERICA INTEND TO OVERTURN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS AND TO DESTROY ‘DEMOCRACY’”?
In the absence of abundant clarification—pointing out that “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” is a TRUMP AGENDA AMOUNTING TO “EXTREMISM” and “FASCISM”, THAT RUPTURES THE FOUNDATION OF THE COUNTRY, and so forth—which defeats the purpose of simple propagandistic messaging/sloganeering, constant references to “MAGA” in a maligning, derogatory sense works its magic of seduction on the psyche more effectively.
And, on the other side of the political spectrum, what does the expression ‘RADICAL LEFT’ mean?
A perfunctory search of the meaning using Microsoft’s AI “ChatGPT 4.0” provides the following response:
The term radical left refers to the political ideology that is further to the left on the left-right political spectrum than the standard political left. The term does not have a single, coherent definition; some scholars consider it to represent the left of social democracy, while others limit it to the left of communist parties1. The far-left politics, also known as the radical left or extreme left, are politics further to the left on the left-right political spectrum than the standard political left. The term does not have a single, coherent definition; some scholars consider it to represent the left of social democracy, while others limit it to the left of communist parties1. Far-left ideologies often include types of socialism, communism, and anarchism12. Far-left politics is seen as radical politics because it calls for fundamental change to the capitalist socio-economic structure of society1.”
AI suggests the expression ‘RADICAL LEFT’ has many CONNOTATIONS and has no uniform DENOTATION, a specific “coherent” definition. What is needed is a catalog of entities to which the expression accurately applies.
This is imperative since I have referenced THIS “RADICAL LEFT” throughout this Essay.
The Arbalest Quarrel (“AQ”) has provided a working definition in PART ONE of the Essay, and AQ reiterates it at the bottom of this footnote.
One thing is clear: those on the POLITICAL LEFT” DO NOT USE THE EXPRESSION. They don’t like it. They see it as a pejorative. AQ sees it simply as an apt DESCRIPTOR.
But the “LEFT,” for its part, relishes using the TERM ‘MAGA’ when talking about TRUMP SUPPORTERS, and they intend for it to be considered a pejorative. Let them consider to think of it as such.
Trump’s supporters use it as a BADGE OF HONOR, and rightly so, for the EXPRESSION “‘MAGA’ AMERICAN” equates with the phrase “AMERICAN ‘PATRIOT.’” And, there is nothing derogatory about the latter phrase, and therefore nothing derogatory about the former phrase, but that those who hate and fear Trump and his supporters make their hatred and fear abundantly clear. Fine!
Of note, the word, ‘PATRIOT,’ is a word that the “RADICAL LEFT” rarely uses to describe itself. Many perceive the word ‘PATRIOT’ as alluding to the term ‘NATIONALISM’—a thing they eschew.
Some on the Political Left, though, profess to have an ambivalent attitude toward the word, ‘PATRIOTISM.’
A few writers argue the Political LEFT—without bothering to differentiate the degree of leftward slant—should embrace the term for itself.
See, e.g., discussion in CNN, the Daily Beast, The National News, and an article in Harvard Political Review.
And that brings me back to the expression, ‘RADICAL LEFT.’
What are Americans to make of THAT expression?
In his work, “Justice for All,” Greg Kelly uses the expression as a shorthand for Marxist and Anarchist Groups such as “BLACK LIVES MATTER” (BLM) and ANTIFA.
This is consistent with the way the expression ‘RADICAL LEFT’ is used by many writers and political commentators, albeit more so for ANTIFA and less so for BLM, likely because doing so impinges—if only obliquely—on issues of “RACISM” which has, through time, become a dangerous thing to touch, especially for members of the “WHITE RACE” (what BLM and others consider, by their FAIRY TALE NOTION of an AWFUL OGRE: Members of “THE OPPRESSOR (PRIVILEGED CLASS)—THE “WHITE RACE”.
And a member of THAT “PRIVILEGED” CLASS—THAT “WHITE RACE”—must be EVER circumspect. It must handle the issue gingerly, as one ought to handle with care—IF ONE EVER HAS NEED TO—SULPHURIC ACID,—lest that person “GET SERIOUSLY BURNED” if he is not careful.
Those individuals who might willingly and even proudly consider themselves “POLITICAL PROGRESSIVES” or “‘SOCIAL’ DEMOCRATS” and who describe themselves as such would never deign to, or dare to, call themselves “MARXISTS” or “SOCIALISTS,” much less “COMMUNISTS” or “LENINISTS.”
And they would not deign to call themselves “RADICAL LEFTISTS” as that expression, and the aforementioned four PHRASES, would TAINT THEM AS OUTRIGHT EXTREMISTS, notwithstanding that these “POLITICAL PROGRESSIVES” and “SOCIAL DEMOCRATS” are already WELL BEYOND THE PALE of what it means to be an American, CONSISTENT WITH THE IMPORT OF THE CONSTITUTION and with notions of ‘FREEDOM,’ ‘LIBERTY,’ and ‘FUNDAMENTAL, NATURAL LAW RIGHTS.’
AND FOR MANY AMERICANS, PHRASES SUCH AS “SOCIAL DEMOCRATS” AND “POLITICAL PROGRESSIVES” ARE BUT ONE STEP REMOVED FROM LABELS OF OPPROBRIUM ANYWAY—DEFINITELY NOT POLITICAL LABELS FOR ONE TO BE PROUD OF AS DESCRIPTORS FOR ONESELF.
BUT, AS FOR THE SUGGESTIVE IMPORT OF THE PHRASE “RADICAL LEFT,” THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT.
THOSE TO WHOM THE LABEL IS PROPERLY AFFIXED SHUN IT. BUT IT IS FOR THE ACCURACY OF IT THAT IT CONTINUES TO BE USED.
But some writers disagree, finding it somehow offensive even as applied to a despicable outfit like ANTIFA.
But these writers struggle to declare it inapposite as applied to ANTIFA and its members, even though it is AMONG THE LEAST OFFENSIVE APPELLATIONS to be affixed to this MARXIST-ANARCHIST-INTERNATIONALIST GROUP. See, e.g., the article in Forbes.
I demur. I agree with Greg Kelly that the term, ‘RADICAL LEFT’ is an apt descriptor for organizations like ‘ANTIFA’ AND ‘BLM.’
Further, it is AQ’s learned conjecture the expression ‘RADICAL LEFT’ is an apt descriptor for anyone or for any organization, group, political bloc, or secretive cabal, that calls for OPEN BORDERS and. either wittingly or not, or openly or tacitly, or knowingly or not, disparages or denies, or naively dismisses the import of, the concept of ‘nation-state,’ and of ‘natural law’ rights, and of ‘citizen of ([name of Country]’) (as opposed to the vacuous and nonsensical notion of the phrase, ‘citizen of the world’).
The Arbalest Quarrel has identified THREE DISCRETE (DISTINCT) COMPONENTS of the ‘RADICAL LEFT’ as named and described in PART ONE of this MULTI SERIES.
AQ sets forth in PART ONE——
THREE POWERFUL COMPONENTS or CONTINGENTS—operating at times singly, and often jointly—comprise the “RADICAL LEFT”:
ONE: Neo-Marxist (Racialist) Globalist Idealogues,’’ Classical Marxist Idealogues, and Gender Idealogues. These are the “true believers” (Cultists).
They infest the social media sphere.
Substantial numbers are found in higher-tier academia and lower-tier education.
Many are opinion writers for newspapers and periodicals or commentators in Cable and Broadcast news (the “mainstream media”).
They proliferate in mid-level management positions in the private sector and mid-level management positions in the public sector (Federal, State, and local bureaucracies). They populate Congress, the Federal Bureaucracy, and state, county, and municipal governmental offices.
They include individuals who work for powerful NGOs, the UN, and the EU, and many are staffers for Congress.
They are also found in the vast Entertainment and Sports industries.
TWO: Neoliberal Globalist “Elites”—the Billionaire Industrialists and Financiers. These people control the vast corporate sectors. Their acumen, political interests, and influence extend to the U.S., EU, and the British Commonwealth Nations—essentially over all of Western Civilization. [FOR EXAMPLE, REGULAR PARTICIPANTS OF THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (DAVOS, SWITZERLAND), INCLUDING REPRESENTATIVES OF NATIONS, AND INFLUENTIAL ELITES AMONG THE ATTENDEES AT DAVOS]
THREE: Political Leaders, Policy Makers, and High-ranking Bureaucratic Functionaries at all levels and Branches of Government (Federal and State)
These people populate much of Congress. Many are crass opportunists who, for personal gain, espouse loyalty to those orchestrating the destruction of the Republic, and do their part to effectuate its dissolution.
Many are proponents of “Democratic Socialism,” also referred to as “Political Progressivism”—benign verbiage for ‘Communism’ or ‘Leninism’).
They include Political “Moderates” (sometimes referred to as “Centrists”) and “Liberals.” Many Republicans also fall into this camp as well (chameleons?)
Operating often in unison, they bear responsibility for the calamity affecting and negatively impacting our Nation, our Constitution, and our people.
These three components have formed an informal confederation or coalition of sorts, often operating in unison.
They draw many of the hoi polloi to their cause—assisting, if unconsciously, in the ruin of a Free, Independent, Sovereign Nation-State.
Inexorably and with increasing swiftness, a transformation of our Free Republic has occurred.
There may be other components that AQ has yet to consider. And arguably AQ ought to include average members of the public—those individuals who do not exert influence but for their voting patterns and belief systems. Together, these individuals form a force to be reckoned with.
These average Americans may have a natural proclivity toward NEO-MARXIST DOGMA and/or NEOLIBERAL GLOBALIST IDEAS AND AIMS or may have fallen prey to the seduction of PROPAGANDA foisted on them via the PRESS and SOCIAL MEDIA, and CABLE and BROADCAST NEWS SHOWS and COMMENTARY, TALK SHOWS and COMEDY SHOWS. Or they may have developed a proclivity toward NEO-MARXIST and/or NEO-LIBERAL GLOBALIST sensibilities from having taken part in informal discussions or through idle conversations with family members, with friends and acquaintances, or with business associates, or with those they have met through social activities.
The “RADICAL LEFT” is VERY REAL and definitely a FORMIDABLE FORCE. It is everywhere in our Nation and in the nations loosely comprising Western Civilization. And it permeates through every layer of society. It is as prolific in this Country—as it is in any other Country.
The RADICAL LEFT has directed substantial and continuous effort, in TIME, MONEY, and ORGANIZATION, TO DESTROY Americans’ STRONG bonds to its HISTORY, HERITAGE, CULTURE, NATIONAL ETHOS, and JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC, and, most importantly, TO ITS BILL OF RIGHTS—THE ONLY TRUE AND EFFECTIVE BILL OF RIGHTS IN THE WORLD—GROUNDED ON NATURAL LAW RIGHTS OF MAN, PREEXISTENT IN MAN, BESTOWED ON MAN BY THE DIVINE CREATOR, AND BEYOND THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT TO LAWFULLY DENY, IGNORE, OR TAMPER WITH IN ANY MANNER.
AMERICANS’ continued continuous exercise OF THE NATION’S FUNDAMENTAL NATURAL LAW RIGHTS is the only way to thwart TOTALITARIANISM.
ALL other Western Nations face the incipient threat of dissolution into Tyranny because the people lack a truly tenable Bill of Rights.
Consider the FALL FROM GRACE of CANADA, under the RADICAL LEFT FLUNKY, JUSTIN TRUDEAU.
THE AWFUL FATE of CANADA, that of the EU, and of the BRITISH COMMONWEALTH NATIONS hangs over THE UNITED STATES.
Will we suffer their fate? THE RADICAL LEFT WOULD WISH IT SO AND ARE DOING EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO MAKE IT SO.
AT LEAST HALF OF THE U.S. POPULATION HAS A PROBLEM WITH THAT, AND THEY ARE ARMED TO THE HILT. THE RADICAL LEFT WRINGS ITS HANDS IN CONSTANT FRUSTRATION AND CONSTERNATION OVER THAT. LET THEM CONTINUE TO DO SO.